Bug#193124: marked as done (khelpcenter: Second window opens on session restore)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:18 -0500
with message-id <200501162103.24654.christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
and subject line Bug no longer relevant, so closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 13 May 2003 03:09:04 +0000
>From jdalbec@cboss.com Mon May 12 22:09:03 2003
Return-path: <jdalbec@cboss.com>
Received: from mail-1.zoominternet.net [63.67.120.5]
by master.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 19FQA3-0007lf-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 22:09:03 -0500
Received: (qmail 5572 invoked from network); 13 May 2003 03:09:01 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO bill.localdomain) ([24.154.66.179]) (envelope-sender <jdalbec@cboss.com>)
by mail-1.zoominternet.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; 13 May 2003 03:09:01 -0000
Received: from john by bill.localdomain with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19FQ9z-0007cf-00; Mon, 12 May 2003 23:08:59 -0400
From: John Dalbec <jdalbec@cboss.com>
Subject: khelpcenter: Second window opens on session restore
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Mailer: bug 3.3.10.1
Message-Id: <E19FQ9z-0007cf-00@bill.localdomain>
Date: Mon, 12 May 2003 23:08:59 -0400
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_05_09 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: khelpcenter
Version: 4:3.1.1-1
Severity: normal
I saved my session with a khelpcenter window in the top right corner of the screen.
The khelpcenter window is smaller than the default size.
When I log back in the khelpcenter window opens correctly, but then a second khelpcenter window opens in the default size.
I tried resaving my session but it didn't help.
-- System Information
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Kernel Version: Linux bill 2.4.18-k6 #1 Sun Apr 14 12:43:22 EST 2002 i586 unknown unknown GNU/Linux
Versions of the packages khelpcenter depends on:
ii kdelibs4 3.1.1-1 KDE core libraries
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.12-1 Library of functions for 2D graphics - runti
ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries and Timezone
ii libfam0c102 2.6.9-4 client library to control the FAM daemon
ii libgcc1 3.3-0pre9 GCC support library
ii libjpeg62 6b-7 The Independent JPEG Group's JPEG runtime li
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5-10 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3.1.1-8 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime version)
ii libstdc++5 3.3-0pre9 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii xlibs 4.2.1-6 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1.1.4-11 compression library - runtime
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 193124-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2005 02:03:30 +0000
>From christopher.martin@utoronto.ca Sun Jan 16 18:03:30 2005
Return-path: <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Received: from tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.188]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CqMEo-0002G9-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:03:26 -0800
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.49.17.55])
by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
id <20050117020322.SUTX25979.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@[192.168.0.100]>;
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:22 -0500
From: Christopher Martin <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Reply-To: Christopher Martin <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
To: 89622-done@bugs.debian.org,
107756-done@bugs.debian.org,
116585-done@bugs.debian.org,
121344-done@bugs.debian.org,
121933-done@bugs.debian.org,
123535-done@bugs.debian.org,
131545-done@bugs.debian.org,
145376-done@bugs.debian.org,
156949-done@bugs.debian.org,
193124-done@bugs.debian.org,
201189-done@bugs.debian.org,
203709-done@bugs.debian.org,
219906-done@bugs.debian.org,
237042-done@bugs.debian.org,
243956-done@bugs.debian.org,
253700-done@bugs.debian.org,
180352-done@bugs.debian.org,
194398-done@bugs.debian.org,
196679-done@bugs.debian.org,
196723-done@bugs.debian.org,
197369-done@bugs.debian.org,
197425-done@bugs.debian.org,
198152-done@bugs.debian.org,
198306-done@bugs.debian.org,
200314-done@bugs.debian.org,
202685-done@bugs.debian.org,
205009-done@bugs.debian.org,
207556-done@bugs.debian.org,
209305-done@bugs.debian.org,
211542-done@bugs.debian.org,
212925-done@bugs.debian.org,
216073-done@bugs.debian.org,
216929-done@bugs.debian.org,
217300-done@bugs.debian.org,
217717-done@bugs.debian.org,
222662-done@bugs.debian.org,
227199-done@bugs.debian.org,
231688-done@bugs.debian.org,
232501-done@bugs.debian.org,
234111-done@bugs.debian.org,
234656-done@bugs.debian.org,
238813-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug no longer relevant, so closing
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:18 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200501162103.24654.christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Delivered-To: 193124-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 10
Hello,
This bug is being closed because of its age and the vanishingly small
chance that it is still relevant to the current KDE packages, as it was
clearly since fixed, a random unreproducible bug that never had enough of
a follow-up to be useful, or else was forwarded upstream, where it was
marked fixed some time ago.
In case I'm mistaken, please do re-open the bug report in question, and
explain how the report is still relevant.
Thanks,
Christopher Martin
Reply to: