Bug#207556: marked as done (konqueror-nsplugins: Acroread plugin does not work)
Your message dated Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:18 -0500
with message-id <200501162103.24654.christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
and subject line Bug no longer relevant, so closing
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 27 Aug 2003 22:40:32 +0000
>From ricpelo@hotmail.com Wed Aug 27 17:40:30 2003
Return-path: <ricpelo@hotmail.com>
Received: from 79.red-81-41-81.pooles.rima-tde.net (Yuggoth) [81.41.81.79]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19s8xp-0006hs-00; Wed, 27 Aug 2003 17:40:29 -0500
Received: from ricardo by Yuggoth with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 19s8yU-0000gn-00; Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:41:10 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: =?iso-8859-1?q?Ricardo_P=E9rez_L=F3pez?= <ricpelo@hotmail.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: konqueror-nsplugins: Acroread plugin does not work
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10.1
Date: Thu, 28 Aug 2003 00:41:09 +0200
Message-Id: <E19s8yU-0000gn-00@Yuggoth>
Sender: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Ricardo_P=E9rez_L=F3pez?= <ricardo@Yuggoth>
X-BadReturnPath: ricardo@Yuggoth rewritten as ricpelo@hotmail.com
using "From" header
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.5 required=4.0
tests=HAS_PACKAGE,PENISACCENT,SEMIFORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_8_27 (1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: konqueror-nsplugins
Version: 4:3.1.3-1
Severity: normal
Acroread plugin does not work with konqueror, but it works perfectly in
mozilla or galeon, for example.
When I try to load a pdf file into konqueror, it shows the following
message in the status line (below the main window):
"Loading Netscape plugin for file:/home/..."
but nothing more happens.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux Yuggoth 2.4.22 #1 mar ago 26 20:42:30 CEST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=es_ES@euro, LC_CTYPE=es_ES@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set)
Versions of packages konqueror-nsplugins depends on:
ii kdelibs4 4:3.1.3-1 KDE core libraries
ii lesstif1 1:0.93.40-1 OSF/Motif 1.2 implementation relea
ii libart-2.0-2 2.3.11-3 Library of functions for 2D graphi
ii libc6 2.3.2-2 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfam0c102 2.6.9-4 client library to control the FAM
ii libgcc1 1:3.3.2-0pre1 GCC support library
ii libpng12-0 1.2.5.0-4 PNG library - runtime
ii libqt3c102-mt 3:3.1.1-8 Qt GUI Library (Threaded runtime v
ii libstdc++5 1:3.3.2-0pre1 The GNU Standard C++ Library v3
ii libxrender1 0.8.2-1 X Rendering Extension client libra
ii xlibs 4.2.1-6 X Window System client libraries
ii zlib1g 1:1.1.4-11 compression library - runtime
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 207556-done) by bugs.debian.org; 17 Jan 2005 02:03:28 +0000
>From christopher.martin@utoronto.ca Sun Jan 16 18:03:28 2005
Return-path: <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Received: from tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net [209.226.175.188]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CqMEo-0002G9-00; Sun, 16 Jan 2005 18:03:26 -0800
Received: from [192.168.0.100] ([70.49.17.55])
by tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net
(InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP
id <20050117020322.SUTX25979.tomts25-srv.bellnexxia.net@[192.168.0.100]>;
Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:22 -0500
From: Christopher Martin <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Reply-To: Christopher Martin <christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
To: 89622-done@bugs.debian.org,
107756-done@bugs.debian.org,
116585-done@bugs.debian.org,
121344-done@bugs.debian.org,
121933-done@bugs.debian.org,
123535-done@bugs.debian.org,
131545-done@bugs.debian.org,
145376-done@bugs.debian.org,
156949-done@bugs.debian.org,
193124-done@bugs.debian.org,
201189-done@bugs.debian.org,
203709-done@bugs.debian.org,
219906-done@bugs.debian.org,
237042-done@bugs.debian.org,
243956-done@bugs.debian.org,
253700-done@bugs.debian.org,
180352-done@bugs.debian.org,
194398-done@bugs.debian.org,
196679-done@bugs.debian.org,
196723-done@bugs.debian.org,
197369-done@bugs.debian.org,
197425-done@bugs.debian.org,
198152-done@bugs.debian.org,
198306-done@bugs.debian.org,
200314-done@bugs.debian.org,
202685-done@bugs.debian.org,
205009-done@bugs.debian.org,
207556-done@bugs.debian.org,
209305-done@bugs.debian.org,
211542-done@bugs.debian.org,
212925-done@bugs.debian.org,
216073-done@bugs.debian.org,
216929-done@bugs.debian.org,
217300-done@bugs.debian.org,
217717-done@bugs.debian.org,
222662-done@bugs.debian.org,
227199-done@bugs.debian.org,
231688-done@bugs.debian.org,
232501-done@bugs.debian.org,
234111-done@bugs.debian.org,
234656-done@bugs.debian.org,
238813-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug no longer relevant, so closing
Date: Sun, 16 Jan 2005 21:03:18 -0500
User-Agent: KMail/1.7.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200501162103.24654.christopher.martin@utoronto.ca>
Delivered-To: 207556-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
X-CrossAssassin-Score: 23
Hello,
This bug is being closed because of its age and the vanishingly small
chance that it is still relevant to the current KDE packages, as it was
clearly since fixed, a random unreproducible bug that never had enough of
a follow-up to be useful, or else was forwarded upstream, where it was
marked fixed some time ago.
In case I'm mistaken, please do re-open the bug report in question, and
explain how the report is still relevant.
Thanks,
Christopher Martin
Reply to: