Bug#227839: marked as done (kde-extras (main) Recommends ksetisaver (contrib))
Your message dated Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:02:34 -0500
with message-id <E1CXQl8-0004Tv-00@newraff.debian.org>
and subject line Bug#227839: fixed in meta-kde-extras 5:42
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 15 Jan 2004 06:12:31 +0000
>From neroden@twcny.rr.com Thu Jan 15 00:12:31 2004
Return-path: <neroden@twcny.rr.com>
Received: from ms-smtp-01-qfe0.nyroc.rr.com (ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com) [24.24.2.55]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ah0k2-0004fZ-00; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 00:12:30 -0600
Received: from doctormoo (syr-24-58-120-156.twcny.rr.com [24.58.120.156])
by ms-smtp-01.nyroc.rr.com (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id i0F6CQHN008727;
Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:12:26 -0500 (EST)
Received: by doctormoo (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 62A4E43C07; Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:12:23 -0500 (EST)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Nathanael Nerode <neroden@gcc.gnu.org>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kde-extras (main) Recommends ksetisaver (contrib)
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.37
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2004 01:12:23 -0500
Message-Id: <20040115061223.62A4E43C07@doctormoo>
X-Virus-Scanned: Symantec AntiVirus Scan Engine
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_01_14
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kde-extras
Version: 4:3.1.2
Severity: serious
Tags: patch
Justification: Policy 2.2.1
Change the "Recommends" to a "Suggests" in order to comply with policy.
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 227839-close) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Nov 2004 21:08:10 +0000
>From katie@ftp-master.debian.org Thu Nov 25 13:08:09 2004
Return-path: <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Received: from newraff.debian.org [208.185.25.31] (mail)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CXQqX-0003j4-00; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 13:08:09 -0800
Received: from katie by newraff.debian.org with local (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CXQl8-0004Tv-00; Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:02:34 -0500
From: Christopher Martin <chrsmrtn@freeshell.org>
To: 227839-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Katie: $Revision: 1.51 $
Subject: Bug#227839: fixed in meta-kde-extras 5:42
Message-Id: <E1CXQl8-0004Tv-00@newraff.debian.org>
Sender: Archive Administrator <katie@ftp-master.debian.org>
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2004 16:02:34 -0500
Delivered-To: 227839-close@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Source: meta-kde-extras
Source-Version: 5:42
We believe that the bug you reported is fixed in the latest version of
meta-kde-extras, which is due to be installed in the Debian FTP archive:
kde-devel-extras_42_all.deb
to pool/main/m/meta-kde-extras/kde-devel-extras_42_all.deb
kde-extras_42_all.deb
to pool/main/m/meta-kde-extras/kde-extras_42_all.deb
meta-kde-extras_42.dsc
to pool/main/m/meta-kde-extras/meta-kde-extras_42.dsc
meta-kde-extras_42.tar.gz
to pool/main/m/meta-kde-extras/meta-kde-extras_42.tar.gz
A summary of the changes between this version and the previous one is
attached.
Thank you for reporting the bug, which will now be closed. If you
have further comments please address them to 227839@bugs.debian.org,
and the maintainer will reopen the bug report if appropriate.
Debian distribution maintenance software
pp.
Christopher Martin <chrsmrtn@freeshell.org> (supplier of updated meta-kde-extras package)
(This message was generated automatically at their request; if you
believe that there is a problem with it please contact the archive
administrators by mailing ftpmaster@debian.org)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Format: 1.7
Date: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 17:30:38 -0500
Source: meta-kde-extras
Binary: kde-devel-extras kde-extras
Architecture: source all
Version: 5:42
Distribution: unstable
Urgency: low
Maintainer: Debian Qt/KDE Maintainers <debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org>
Changed-By: Christopher Martin <chrsmrtn@freeshell.org>
Description:
kde-devel-extras - The K Desktop Environment (extra development files)
kde-extras - The K Desktop Environment (extras)
Closes: 227839 263582 274767
Changes:
meta-kde-extras (5:42) unstable; urgency=low
.
* New uploader.
* Updated metapackage version to match meta-kde.
* Removed recommends on kcachegrind, kgpg, kopete, juk, umbrello, vimpart
(now in the main KDE packages).
* Removed boson and klog from the recommended list for now, as they aren't
in Testing.
* Removed recommend on mp3kult (orphaned).
* Added recommends on apollon, kaffeine, kbiff, kdiff3,
konversation, okle, smb4k (recently added to the archive).
* Updated package relations from kdevelop to kdevelop3. (Closes: #274767)
* Thanks to Frank Lichtenheld and Andreas Barth for their NMUs.
(Closes: #227839, #263582)
Files:
f15d10dcf1d939063e6696089778ed3e 651 kde optional meta-kde-extras_42.dsc
27a08123cdebc695f588b5ad22f64438 7803 kde optional meta-kde-extras_42.tar.gz
65d946e27a363cd18172ef786f30aec7 7350 kde optional kde-devel-extras_42_all.deb
831b580e93af26c23291dc832b13e817 7664 kde optional kde-extras_42_all.deb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBpkYw3JE9mF3wMWcRAmoSAJ9x6U8QarKW0dTR0r+waH9PKJ3/AQCeNVAG
kkFUbM+5nUKwya8p9QFeSek=
=JckU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: