[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#244391: /usr/bin/kwrite: Unindent is not fine any more



Package: kate
Version: 4:3.2.1-1
Severity: wishlist
File: /usr/bin/kwrite

If I have the following situation:
{
        int a=0;
//      a+=5;
        cerr << a <<endl;
}
now I want to remove the braces. If I mark anything and try to unindent
this does not 
work any longer because the comment blocks this. I really preferred the
former 
behaviour of the indentation. It could be also used to format text I
copied from 
somewhere which was indented with spaces.

Greetings Ben

-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux benjamin 2.6.5 #1 Wed Apr 14 19:00:38 CEST 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=en_IE@euro, LC_CTYPE=de_DE@euro (ignored: LC_ALL set to
en_IE@euro)

Versions of packages kate depends on:
ii  kdelibs4                    4:3.2.2-1    KDE core libraries
ii  libart-2.0-2                2.3.16-1     Library of functions for 2D
graphi
ii  libc6                       2.3.2.ds1-11 GNU C Library: Shared
libraries an
ii  libfam0c102                 2.6.10-6     client library to control
the FAM 
ii  libgcc1                     1:3.3.3-2    GCC support library
ii  libice6                     4.3.0-2      Inter-Client Exchange
library
ii  libpng12-0                  1.2.5.0-4    PNG library - runtime
ii  libqt3c102-mt               3:3.2.3-2    Qt GUI Library (Threaded
runtime v
ii  libsm6                      4.3.0-2      X Window System Session
Management
ii  libstdc++5                  1:3.3.3-2    The GNU Standard C++
Library v3
ii  libx11-6                    4.3.0-2      X Window System protocol
client li
ii  libxext6                    4.3.0-2      X Window System
miscellaneous exte
ii  libxrender1                 0.8.2-1      X Rendering Extension
client libra
ii  xlibs                       4.3.0-2      X Window System client
libraries m
ii  zlib1g                      1:1.2.1-3    compression library -
runtime

-- no debconf information





Reply to: