Re: Consider building ksysguardd without libsensors support for now?

[Riku Voipio <riku.voipio@iki.fi>]

On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 05:43:07PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> I notice that the lm-sensors dependency is i386-specific, so presumably
> it's just an optional feature. I'd really like to remove this roadblock
> so that we can get on with other things, and maybe put it back later if
> and when lm-sensors gets sorted out. Would you consider building
> ksysguardd without lm-sensors support for now?

Personally I'm all for it, lm-sensors has given nothing but grey
hairs, and sensors aren't the main functionality of ksysguardd
anyway. If someone uses the feature, maybe this move will enough
to motivate them to get lm-sensors fixed.

We would sitll have to wait for qt to compile to on mipsel to
avoid getting a failed build and getting kicked into the end
of que...

If Chris is busy (preparing kde3.2 debs the unwashed hordes 
will want the second it is released), I have no problem uploading
this (oneline) fix. AFAIK the other pending issues are the
kate libkregexpeditor -> kregexpeditor recommends update
and possibly #203722 (-mieee for alpha). previous is trivial
but the latter needs confirmation from the submitter, or 
someone else owning an alpha.

-- 
Riku Voipio  	       |    riku.voipio@iki.fi         |
kirkkonummentie 33     |    +358 40 8476974          --+--
02140 Espoo            |                               |
dark> A bad analogy is like leaky screwdriver          |