[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#204317: marked as done (konqueror cookies problem)

Your message dated Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:01:29 +0100
with message-id <87fzf0lypi.fsf@student.kuleuven.ac.be>
and subject line Bug#204317: leftover from 2.2
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Aug 2003 08:19:34 +0000
>From jedd@progsoc.org Wed Aug 06 03:19:32 2003
Return-path: <jedd@progsoc.org>
Received: from mail023.syd.optusnet.com.au [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 19kJW7-0006p7-00; Wed, 06 Aug 2003 03:19:32 -0500
Received: from jarre.home.au (c211-28-92-93.rivrw5.nsw.optusnet.com.au [])
	by mail023.syd.optusnet.com.au (8.11.6p2/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h768JQt02532
	for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 6 Aug 2003 18:19:29 +1000
From: jedd <jedd@progsoc.org>
Reply-To: jedd@progsoc.org
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Subject: konqueror cookies problem
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 18:19:26 +1000
User-Agent: KMail/1.5.3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200308061819.26236.jedd@progsoc.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.0 required=4.0
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20 (

Package: konqueror
Version: 3.1.3-1

 When I attempt to change cookie settings (Settings / Configure Konq / Cookies)
 I get the following dialog box:

      KDE Control Module
      There was an error loading module
      'Settings / Network / WebBrowsing/cookies.desktop'
      The diagnostic is:
      Library files for 'libkcm-kio.la' not found in paths

 This is on a sid i386 box upgraded to latest unstable as at 6/Aug/2003.


Received: (at 204317-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jan 2004 11:14:05 +0000
>From dominique.devriese@student.kuleuven.ac.be Thu Jan 01 05:14:04 2004
Return-path: <dominique.devriese@student.kuleuven.ac.be>
Received: from thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1Ac0Zy-0007u4-00; Thu, 01 Jan 2004 05:01:26 -0600
Received: from localhost (localhost [])
	by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 9211C137E1E; Thu,  1 Jan 2004 12:01:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from octavianus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (octavianus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be [])
	by thumbler.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 1AEBC137E1C; Thu,  1 Jan 2004 12:01:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from appel (domi.kotnet.org [])
	by octavianus.kulnet.kuleuven.ac.be (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 09390AEA24; Thu,  1 Jan 2004 12:01:25 +0100 (CET)
Received: from domi by appel with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
	id 1Ac0a2-0000Qq-00; Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:01:30 +0100
To: jedd@progsoc.org
Cc: 204317-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#204317: leftover from 2.2
References: <8765fx4qlg.fsf@student.kuleuven.ac.be>
From: Dominique Devriese <dominique.devriese@student.kuleuven.ac.be>
Date: Thu, 01 Jan 2004 12:01:29 +0100
In-Reply-To: <200401011727.03427.jedd@progsoc.org> (jedd@progsoc.org's
 message of "Thu, 1 Jan 2004 17:27:03 +1100")
Message-ID: <87fzf0lypi.fsf@student.kuleuven.ac.be>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Reasonable Discussion,
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: Dominique Devriese <dominique.devriese@student.kuleuven.ac.be>
X-Virus-Scanned: by KULeuven Antivirus Cluster
Delivered-To: 204317-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on master.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no 

jedd  writes:

>  Hi Dominique,

>  Yes - I can confirm that this got cleared up some time ago (sorry
>  for not clearing the bug report).

Ok, I'm then closing the bug report.


Reply to: