Re: UDD lists more than one source package for aboot
Hi Lucas,
Am Mon, Sep 15, 2025 at 08:50:16AM +0200 schrieb Lucas Nussbaum:
> On 15/09/25 at 07:36 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> > Another issue:
> >
> > udd=> select source, version, distribution, release, component, maintainer, vcs_url, architecture, extra_source_only from sources where release = 'sid' and source = 'aboot' order by maintainer;
> > source | version | distribution | release | component | maintainer | vcs_url | architecture | extra_source_only
> > --------+-------------------+--------------+---------+-----------+----------------------------------------------------------+------------------------------------------------------------+--------------+-------------------
> > aboot | 1.0~pre20200212-1 | debian | sid | main | John Paul Adrian Glaubitz <glaubitz@physik.fu-berlin.de> | https://salsa.debian.org/debian/aboot.git | any all |
> > aboot | 1.0~pre20040408-4 | debian | sid | main | Steve Langasek <vorlon@debian.org> | http://bzr.debian.org/bzr/pkg-aboot/aboot/branches/debian/ | any all |
> > (2 Zeilen)
>
> according to rmadison:
> $ rmadison -S aboot
> aboot | 1.0~pre20040408-4 | unstable | source
> aboot | 1.0~pre20200212-1 | unstable | source
> aboot | 1.0~pre20200212-1 | unstable-debug | source
> aboot-base | 1.0~pre20040408-4 | unstable | all
> aboot-cross | 1.0~pre20200212-1 | unstable | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, s390x
> aboot-cross | 1.0~pre20200212-1+b1 | unstable | riscv64
> aboot-cross-dbgsym | 1.0~pre20200212-1 | unstable-debug | amd64, arm64, armel, armhf, i386, mips64el, ppc64el, s390x
> aboot-cross-dbgsym | 1.0~pre20200212-1+b1 | unstable-debug | riscv64
Ahhh, this time I failed to consult rmadison and this would have brought
the explanation ...
> So there's a aboot-base package, Architecture:all, built from the
> aboot/1.0~pre20040408-4 source. That's probably some missing cleanup on
> the ftpmasters side, but I'm not sure why it's not detected and fixed
> automatically. Ask them?
I'll do.
> > > There's a sources_uniq view that hides those.
> >
> > This is fine and I'll use this in future - but I would like to
> > understand the duplicate anyway.
>
> How about https://lists.debian.org/debian-qa/2025/09/msg00026.html ?
This explains extra_source_only but in the aboot case there is no
distinction in this column. That's why I'm asking.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
https://fam-tille.de
Reply to: