Bug#1111251: marked as done (DDPO: bookworm-backports are shown in the stable (trixie) column)
Your message dated Sat, 16 Aug 2025 14:38:12 +0200
with message-id <aKB7tJ-AHU7Lv4zu@msg.df7cb.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#1110832: qa.debian.org: QA shows Bookworm backports in Stable, instead of OldStable
has caused the Debian Bug report #1110832,
regarding DDPO: bookworm-backports are shown in the stable (trixie) column
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1110832: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1110832
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi,
since trixie was released, packages from bookworm-backports are shown in
the stable (trixie) column, possibly extending over testing and sid.
See e.g.
https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?packages=sendmail
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Re: Sebastiaan Couwenberg
> I suspect that manual intervention is required to rotate the bpo:<key> records (delete oldoldstable-bpo:<key> records, rename oldstable-bpo:<key> to oldoldstable-bpo:<key>, and rename bpo:<key> to oldstable-bpo:<key>).
The .db files there are always recreated from scratch, so no updates
needed.
The solution was much more simple anyway:
https://salsa.debian.org/qa/qa/-/blob/master/data/RELEASES?ref_type=heads
had not yet been updated after the release. Did that now, and
backports are shown in the correct place.
Christoph
--- End Message ---
Reply to: