Re: SimulIDE could (should?) be updated but seems unmaintained

To: Ben Tris <benattris@gezapig.nl>, pkg-electronics-devel@alioth-lists.debian.net, Milan Kupcevic <milan@debian.org>, debian-qa@lists.debian.org, debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: SimulIDE could (should?) be updated but seems unmaintained
From: Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2024 15:21:41 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] sa6plpzl6hm.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name>
In-reply-to: <sa6jzpvgzmw.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name>
References: <a07242028de248e398d86400d7b29a7d6679e781.camel@gezapig.nl> <sa6jzpvgzmw.fsf@hjemme.reinholdtsen.name>

Did anyone else see the emails 2023-12-03 and 2023-09-25 about SimulIDE?
Perhaps the original sender should get a reply from someone who know
what is happening with the package?

-- 
Vennlig hilsen
Petter Reinholdtsen

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: SimulIDE could (should?) be updated but seems unmaintained
  - From: Uwe Steinmann <steinm@debian.org>
- Re: SimulIDE could (should?) be updated but seems unmaintained
  - From: Andrey Rakhmatullin <wrar@debian.org>

Prev by Date: Bug#1079070: UDD/lintian: some invalid tags and maybe overload and broken results?
Next by Date: Re: SimulIDE could (should?) be updated but seems unmaintained
Previous by thread: Bug#1079073: qa.debian.org: List of older active sources (PTS)
Next by thread: Re: SimulIDE could (should?) be updated but seems unmaintained
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread