Hi, Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org> wrote on 03/04/2023 at 07:21:38+0200: > Hi DSA, > > On 23/12/22 at 17:17 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote: >> > > > I think we should very much not keep it stale, it's been that way way >> > > > too long already. I'd lean towards shutting it down but a redirect >> > > > would also be OK IMO. >> > > >> > > I started a wiki page to document how to transition from lintian.d.o to >> > > the UDD implementation. That could be useful if you turn lintian.d.o >> > > into a static page saying it has been shutdown, and want to point >> > > somewhere to help people transition. >> > >> > https://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/ReplacingLintianDebianOrg >> >> Hi DSA, >> >> So, >> - lintian.debian.org has now been providing stale data for almost a year >> - the replacement running on top of UDD has been working fine since >> July, and is already used by at least tracker.d.o and >> qa.d.o/developer.php >> - nobody has objected shutting down lintian.debian.org >> >> How can we move forward with the shutdown of lintian.debian.org? > > lintian.debian.org came up again in a discussion > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1033065#54 > > People are confused. Maybe it's time to stop it and point to > https://wiki.debian.org/UltimateDebianDatabase/ReplacingLintianDebianOrg > ? Could you file a RT ticket? if there's already one, can you point it to me, a brief overlook didn't bring it to me. As soon as I have this, I'll try to do what's needed. Cheers! -- PEB
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature