Bug#1003340: qa.debian.org: Please agree with salsa on the lintian version to use
HASHTAG Hackers and other profession getting hacked by guys operating
anonymous - happy black hack holidays
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
Mattia Rizzolo <mattia@debian.org> schrieb am Sonntag, 9. Januar 2022 um 3:58 nachm.:
> On Sat, Jan 08, 2022 at 05:39:04PM +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
>
> > With lintian's current tendency of changing its output, we have to adapt
> >
> > the suppression rules. But it appears that qa.debian.org and salsa's CI
> >
> > rules are not using the same version of lintian, so we are stuck with
> >
> > either having lintian errors showing up on the qa.debian.org page, or
> >
> > having the CI jobs on salsa fail on the lintian step.
>
> Well, you should probably check what the salsa CI are running.
>
> QA is showing data that comes from lintian.debian.org, that AFAIK mostly
>
> runs either the very latest release, or even a current git checkout of
>
> lintian.
>
> I don't think this is a problem for qa.debian.org.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> regards,
>
> Mattia Rizzolo
>
> GPG Key: 66AE 2B4A FCCF 3F52 DA18 4D18 4B04 3FCD B944 4540 .''`. More about me: https://mapreri.org : :' : Launchpad user: https://launchpad.net/~mapreri` . `'`
>
> Debian QA page: https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=mattia `-
Reply to: