[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#960156: marked as done (udd.debian.org: change the lintian importer to use the new export file)

Your message dated Wed, 24 Nov 2021 21:42:34 -0800
with message-id <CAFHYt55AbwyEuCy8GHpnKuSHsQyRJ1hgjvxsf_B-Af985tyNtw@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: udd.debian.org: change the lintian importer to use the new export file
has caused the Debian Bug report #960156,
regarding udd.debian.org: change the lintian importer to use the new export file
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
960156: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=960156
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: lintian.debian.org
Severity: normal

Not sure whether to file this against UDD or lintian or detagtive; filing it
against lintian since it changed more recently and I suspect that's related.

For a while now, the UDD tables for lintian have been empty. They were
previously populated with lintian data.

(Independently of that, I'm curious if there are other avenues of
getting this information that don't involve UDD)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi,

The UDD tables are not empty. The importer is working great.

UDD receives updates, but they are not always timely due to technical
restrictions. A funding request is pending.

Finally, the Lintian website offers a JSON interface [1] that bypasses
UDD completely, as requested by the reporting party.

Kind regards
Felix Lechner

[1] https://lintian.debian.org/query

--- End Message ---
Reply to: