UDD dump seems to be outdated (Was: Why is the list of outdated packages not getting updated?)
Hi,
I think the issue described below by Nilesh Patra might be caused by the
fact that the UDD dump[3] is not updated properly. I just downloaded
the dump and get a modification time of
Modify: 2021-10-11 02:55:01.000000000 +0200
and md5sum
fb9c6cb3ddb3d819983f7c0d82a50669 udd.dump
While the UDD on ullmann has
udd=> select source , version, debian_mangled_uversion, upstream_version, status from upstream where source in ('r-cran-s2','r-cran-rwave') ;
source | version | debian_mangled_uversion | upstream_version | status
--------------+---------+-------------------------+------------------+------------
r-cran-rwave | 2.6-0-1 | 2.6-0 | 2.6-0 | up to date
r-cran-s2 | 1.0.7-3 | 1.0.7 | 1.0.7 | up to date
(2 rows)
my local import has
udd=# select source , version, debian_mangled_uversion, upstream_version, status from upstream where source in ('r-cran-s2','r-cran-rwave') ;
source | version | debian_mangled_uversion | upstream_version | status
--------------+---------+-------------------------+------------------+------------
r-cran-rwave | 2.5-0-1 | 2.5-0 | 2.5-0 | up to date
r-cran-s2 | 1.0.6-1 | 1.0.6 | 1.0.6 | up to date
(2 rows)
Could someone please check the export procedure of the dump?
This probably also affects the public udd mirror (even if I need
to admit that I can not reach this currently).
Kind regards
Andreas.
Am Thu, Oct 07, 2021 at 06:02:59PM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra:
> I had uploaded r-cran-rwave couple of days back, and it has even
> migrated to testing. r-cran-s2 is also updated for a while, but
> it shows the older version here[1]
>
> Same goes for med-team packages, for example augur, bbmap insilicoseq
> so on.
>
> Something wrong with UDD again?
> [1]: https://salsa.debian.org/r-pkg-team/maintenance-utilities/-/blob/master/outdated_r-packages.txt
> [2]: https://salsa.debian.org/med-team/community/helper-scripts/-/blob/master/outdated_med-packages.txt
>
> Nilesh
[3] https://udd.debian.org/dumps/udd.dump
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: