Your message dated Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:19:43 +0200 with message-id <20200628201943.GA8159@xanadu.blop.info> and subject line Re: Bug#782677: udd: scripts/update-upstream-status: should consider sepwatch has caused the Debian Bug report #782677, regarding UDD/upstream: should consider sepwatch to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 782677: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782677 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: udd: scripts/update-upstream-status: should consider sepwatch
- From: "Iain R. Learmonth" <irl@fsfe.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 01:37:01 +0100
- Message-id: <20150416003701.GA7846@shiftout.net>
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: udd Hi, The update-upstream-status script for UDD does not appear to consider sepwatch. sepwatch is a subversion repository which contains seperate watch files submitted by those that are not maintainers of the package but have produced an updated watch file. This allows the new watch file to be used immediately instead of waiting for the next upload, reducing the watch file error count and providing upstream information again. If a watch file is present in the sepwatch repository, it should be used in place of the watch file in the package when updating data for UDD. A new column could be added to the upstream table to indicate the source of the watch file used. https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/HowToHelpWithFixingWatchFiles#How_to_help_with_fixing_debian.2Fwatch_files Thanks, Iain. -- e: irl@fsfe.org w: iain.learmonth.me x: irl@jabber.fsfe.org t: EPVPN 2105 c: 2M0STB g: IO87we p: 1F72 607C 5FF2 CCD5 3F01 600D 56FF 9EA4 E984 6C49Attachment: pgp0zkj54LcK6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 782677-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#782677: udd: scripts/update-upstream-status: should consider sepwatch
- From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 22:19:43 +0200
- Message-id: <20200628201943.GA8159@xanadu.blop.info>
- In-reply-to: <20150416003701.GA7846@shiftout.net>
- References: <20150416003701.GA7846@shiftout.net>
Hi, I'm closing this bug. My understanding is that sepwatch no longer exists (https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org/HowToHelpWithFixingWatchFiles points to alioth). If I'm wrong, please reopen. Thanks LucasAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---