Re: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?

To: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
Cc: Debian QA List <debian-qa@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?
From: Lucas Nussbaum <lucas@debian.org>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2020 22:40:07 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20200413204007.GB19310@xanadu.blop.info>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20200401132433.GN20899@an3as.eu>
References: <[🔎] 20200401132433.GN20899@an3as.eu>

Hi,

On 01/04/20 at 15:24 +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> we all know that Python2 is end of life but several UDD code is using
> Python2.  Is there any effort to port it to Python3.

Not as far as I know. I suspect that, once it becomes necessary, it will
be easy to do given the codebase is relatively small.

Lucas

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?
  - From: Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>

References:
- [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?
  - From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>

Prev by Date: Bug#956590: tracker.debian.org: provide excuse for not migrating to testing
Next by Date: Re: [UDD] Is there any information about failed autopkgtest in UDD?
Previous by thread: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?
Next by thread: Re: [UDD] Is there some effort to port UDD to Python3?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread