Re: rebuilding packages producing no amd64, but other binary-arch packages
On 2019-01-12 15:26, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 08:32:42AM +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> Source packages that build binary-arch packages, but no amd64 binary
>> packages are usually not tested by archive wide rebuilds and may
>> silently FTBFS for a long time.
>
> we build them on amd64/i386/arm64/armhf on
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/
Great, so we already have coverage of 4 architectures.
>> Does anyone have an idea how to quickly build a list of these for sid?
>
> https://tests.reproducible-builds.org/debian/unstable/amd64/index_FTBFS.html
> lists all our ftbfs cases (replace amd64 with one of the three others),
> but it's not easy to get the arch:all packages in that list....
I don't want only the failures.
I want all the source packages building binary packages for a particular
architecture ... and then rebuild the ones not covered by
reproducible-builds on some porterboxes.
Andreas
Reply to: