[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#781519: marked as done (DDPO: shows packages I no longer maintain)

Your message dated Tue, 8 Jan 2019 15:22:14 +0100
with message-id <20190108142214.GA25001@msg.df7cb.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#736715: PTS shouldn't list packages under their maintainer in stable
has caused the Debian Bug report #736715,
regarding DDPO: shows packages I no longer maintain
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
736715: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736715
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hello,
at https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=morph I can still see listed
packages I no longer maintain, like pycurl or sitecopy , at least not in sid.

Please make DDPO sid-centric again, as I think it was the case some time ago.

Thanks in advance,
Sandro

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (500, 'oldstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.14-2-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Re: Adrian Bunk 2014-01-26 <20140126111623.26517.17762.reportbug@localhost>
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> It is confusing that pages like
>   http://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=packages@qa.debian.org
> list whoever maintained packages also under whoever is listed in
> the maintainer field in stable - that person might have given up
> maintainership of the package many years ago (or here in the case
> of packages@qa.debian.org, it is no longer of any interest for QA
> since it does now have a maintainer).
[...]
> I'd expect the maintainer in unstable to be the one and only being
> responsible for all versions of the package.

The logic has been improved recently. Now it lists all packages in
unstable and experimental, plus all (old*)stable packages that have
been removed (but might still be RC-buggy in stable). Packages that
have switched maintainers between stable and unstable are no longer
listed.

Christoph

--- End Message ---
Reply to: