[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#792564: marked as done (qa.d.o/dose: please export distcheck and buildcheck results in a machine readable format)



Your message dated Tue, 11 Sep 2018 20:28:08 +0200
with message-id <20180911182808.GA8780@seneca.home.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#792564: qa.d.o/dose: please export distcheck and buildcheck results in a machine readable format
has caused the Debian Bug report #792564,
regarding qa.d.o/dose: please export distcheck and buildcheck results in a machine readable format
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
792564: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=792564
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

it would be useful to show information about unsatisfiability of binary
and source packages in DMD and the tracker. For that, qa.d.o/dose should
export machine readable data of the latest runs of distcheck and
buildcheck. I guess that the dose yaml format would be sufficient for
this.

It would also be interesting if DMD and the tracker could link back to
the right page on qa.d.o/dose. For that purpose it would be useful to
have stable urls for a given source package which would then redirect to
the page of that source package with the latest timestamp. So then
instead of linking to:

https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_unstable_main/1436936416/packages/analog.html

one could link to:

https://qa.debian.org/dose/debcheck/src_unstable_main/packages/analog.html

I guess it would be okay if that url would 404 if no results exist for
that package for the latest run.

Thanks!

cheers, josch

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Josch,

On Tue, Sep 11, 2018 at 08:46:04AM +0200, Johannes Schauer wrote:
> Hi Ralf,
> 
> did you intentionally not CC bug #792564 in your reply? If not, just CC it in
> yours and feel free to close it because machine readable data is exported as of
> the timestamp of today -- and even under a /latest/ URI. :)

I just forgot to cc the bug, done and closed now! -Ralf.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: