[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#826294: marked as done (DDPO: remove package information not updated)

Your message dated Sat, 9 Jun 2018 20:42:54 +0200
with message-id <20180609184254.GA9577@msg.df7cb.de>
and subject line Re: Bug#826294: DDPO: remove package information not updated
has caused the Debian Bug report #826294,
regarding DDPO: remove package information not updated
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
826294: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=826294
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,

 As https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=henrich ttf-cjk-compact package
 still exists but it was already removed.

 Could you check it, please?

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=ja_JP.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=ja_JP.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Re: Hideki Yamane 2016-06-04 <146501516062.16708.13805762069737551657.reportbug@hp>
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> 
> Dear Maintainer,
> 
>  As https://qa.debian.org/developer.php?login=henrich ttf-cjk-compact package
>  still exists but it was already removed.
> 
>  Could you check it, please?

Hi,

this works as designed. ttf-cjk-compact is still present in jessie,
and since the package can receive bug reports, it should be shown to
the Maintainers/Uploaders so they can act on it.

If you don't want to be bothered about oldstable (or oldoldstable),
you can set the Version column to "stable and newer" or higher
settings.

Cheers,
Christoph

--- End Message ---
Reply to: