[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#874250: marked as done (udd: use reproducible-tracker.json, or to ignore unstable)

Your message dated Mon, 4 Sep 2017 19:56:10 +0200
with message-id <20170904175610.55rog7vjzfbukbcn@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#874250: udd: use reproducible-tracker.json, or to ignore unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #874250,
regarding udd: use reproducible-tracker.json, or to ignore unstable
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
874250: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=874250
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org

Dear UDD-Maintainer,

please either use reproducible-tracker.json, or ignore unstable, but 
really, please dont parse reproducible.json as there are more filters
in place for reproducible-tracker.json.

we *really really* do not want reproducibility results for unstable show
up on UDD, as our unstable results are a.) currently flaky, which is 
annoying (but inevitable due to gcc-7 work…) b.) also contain problems
for which we dont know the solution yet, so they are unactionable and
demotivating.


thanks for maintaining UDD & DMD!

-- 
cheers,
	Holger

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 04/09/17 at 13:21 +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> x-debbugs-cc: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org
> 
> Dear UDD-Maintainer,
> 
> please either use reproducible-tracker.json, or ignore unstable, but 
> really, please dont parse reproducible.json as there are more filters
> in place for reproducible-tracker.json.
> 
> we *really really* do not want reproducibility results for unstable show
> up on UDD, as our unstable results are a.) currently flaky, which is 
> annoying (but inevitable due to gcc-7 work…) b.) also contain problems
> for which we dont know the solution yet, so they are unactionable and
> demotivating.
> 
> 
> thanks for maintaining UDD & DMD!

Fixed, thanks for the report!

Lucas

--- End Message ---
Reply to: