On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 06:12:02PM +0800, Boyuan Yang wrote: > Excuse for libc++ > > Migration status: BLOCKED: Rejected/introduces a regression (please see > below) > Too young, only 0 of 5 days old > missing build on armel: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc++1, > libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.1-2) > missing build on armhf: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc++1, > libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.0-1) > missing build on mips: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc++1, > libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.1-3) > missing build on mips64el: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc+ > +1, libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.0-1) > missing build on mipsel: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc++1, > libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.1-3) > missing build on ppc64el: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc+ > +1, libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.1-3) > missing build on s390x: libc++-dev, libc++-helpers, libc++-test, libc++1, > libc++abi-dev, libc++abi-test, libc++abi1 (from 3.9.1-3) > libc++ has new bugs! > Updating libc++ introduces new bugs: #870440 > Piuparts tested OK - https://piuparts.debian.org/sid/source/libc/libc+ > +.html > Not considered > > Bug #870040 has been fixed for a while [3] yet the excuse still mentions it. It's not fixed on armel (because all fixed versions FTBFS there). -- WBR, wRAR
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature