[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#839385: marked as done (UDD: incorrect affects_<distribution> for fixed bugs)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Oct 2016 14:15:39 +0800
with message-id <1475388939.15107.77.camel@debian.org>
and subject line Re: UDD: incorrect affects_<distribution> for fixed bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #839385,
regarding UDD: incorrect affects_<distribution> for fixed bugs
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
839385: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=839385
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: important
User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org

Dear Maintainer,

The bugs table in UDD has incorrect values for the
affects_<distribution> column for fixed bugs which trigger testing
autoremoval and keep the bugs listed on the TODO list in DMD.

Bug #838463 in libosmium has been fixed in libosmium/2.9.0-2 which
migrated to testing on 2016-09-27 (https://tracker.debian.org/news/800647),
yet the bugreport in UDD still marks it as affects_testing which is
incorrect.

It took some time for the BTS version graph to learn about the fixed
version in testing, but it now correctly reflects the fixed version in
both testing and unstable:

 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/version.cgi?package=src%3Alibosmium;collapse=1;fixed=libosmium%2F2.9.0-2;found=libosmium%2F2.9.0-1;info=1;absolute=0

Another example is bug #836993 in qgis which has been fixed in
qgis/2.14.6+dfsg-4 and migrated to testing on 2016-09-23
(https://tracker.debian.org/news/799738), but the bugreport in UDD still
marks it as affects_testing and affects_unstable whereas the BTS version
graph correctly displays both testing and unstable as fixed:

 https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/version.cgi?absolute=0;found=qgis%2F2.14.5%2Bdfsg-2;found=qgis%2F2.14.6%2Bdfsg-3;found=qgis%2F2.14.6%2Bdfsg-2;collapse=1;package=qgis;info=1;fixed=qgis%2F2.14.6%2Bdfsg-4

I've not been able to troubleshoot the UDD code with the vagrant
environment, but I suspect bugs_gatherer.pl or the Debbugs modules it
uses to be broken on ullmann.debian.org.

Kind Regards,

Bas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sat, 01 Oct 2016 12:16:47 +0200 Bas Couwenberg wrote:

> I've not been able to troubleshoot the UDD code with the vagrant
> environment, but I suspect bugs_gatherer.pl or the Debbugs modules it
> uses to be broken on ullmann.debian.org.

This seems to have been caused by the recent VM shuffle at UBC and it
should be fixed next time the bugs gatherer runs.

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
Reply to: