[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Q: watch file check wrongly report errors



Hi (I'm not on this list, so CC to me please),

 Those 3 packages got uscan error in Maintainer Dashboard page

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> fonts-kanjistrokeorders	debian/watch: uscan returned an error: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line http://www.nihilist.org.uk/ http://www.nihilist.org.uk/KanjiStrokeOrders_v[-_](\d[\-+\.:\~\da-zA-Z]*)(?i)\.(?:tar\.xz|tar\.bz2|tar\.gz|zip)\?attredirects=0 debian uupdate
> 
> fonts-ricty-diminished	debian/watch: uscan returned an error: In debian/watch no matching files for watch line http://www.rs.tus.ac.jp/yyusa/ricty_diminished.html ricty_diminished/ricty_diminished-[-_](\d[\-+\.:\~\da-zA-Z]*)(?i)\.(?:tar\.xz|tar\.bz2|tar\.gz|zip)
> 
> gawk-doc	debian/watch: uscan returned an error:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

 However, it works fine on my box. I guess it may be caused by use version 4
 syntax for debian/watch file.

> $ uscan --verbose
> (snip)
> uscan info: Matching target for downloadurlmangle: https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gawk/gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz
> uscan info: Upstream URL (downloadurlmangled):
>    https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gawk/gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz
> uscan info: Newest upstream tarball version selected for download (uversionmangled): 4.1.4
> uscan info: Download filename (filenamemangled): gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz
> uscan info: Newest version of gawk-doc on remote site is 4.1.4, local version is 4.1.4
> uscan info:    => Package is up to date for from
>       https://ftp.gnu.org/gnu/gawk/gawk-4.1.4.tar.xz
> uscan info: Scan finished

 Can anyone can look into it, please?


 And, https://wiki.debian.org/qa.debian.org says 
 watch file checker is https://qa.debian.org/watch/ but it looks like
 not working now and there is no information to contact person/source.


-- 
Regards,

 Hideki Yamane     henrich @ debian.or.jp/org
 http://wiki.debian.org/HidekiYamane


Reply to: