[PATCH] Debian templates: back-to-old-pts.html
From: Richard Hartmann <richih@debian.org>
Improve wording.
---
.../vendor/debian/templates/debian/back-to-old-pts.html | 12 ++++++------
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/distro_tracker/vendor/debian/templates/debian/back-to-old-pts.html b/distro_tracker/vendor/debian/templates/debian/back-to-old-pts.html
index 19664e0..6655425 100644
--- a/distro_tracker/vendor/debian/templates/debian/back-to-old-pts.html
+++ b/distro_tracker/vendor/debian/templates/debian/back-to-old-pts.html
@@ -1,13 +1,13 @@
{% extends 'core/panels/panel.html' %}
{% block panel-body %}
-<p>This package tracker is better than the old one on many aspects
-(easy to extend, more dynamic, responsive, packed with new features
-such as subscription management on the web, team subscriptions, etc.)
-but should you find some features that are lacking or some other problems,
-then please file bug reports against the
+<p>This package tracker is better than the old one in many regards.
+It is easy to extend, more dynamic, responsive, packed with new features
+such as subscription management on the web, team subscriptions, and more.
+Should you find missing features or any other problem, you are welcome to
+file bug reports against the
<a href="https://bugs.debian.org/tracker.debian.org">tracker.debian.org</a>
-pseudo-package. Also don't hesitate to help us by
+pseudo-package. Also, do not hesitate to help
<a href="https://tracker.debian.org/docs/contributing.html">contributing
patches</a> for those issues.</p>
Not convinced? Go back to the old <a
--
2.1.4
Reply to: