Bug#767024: tracker.debian.org: Reports wrong new upstream for a native package
Hi,
UDD has the correct info, as you can check with:
select * from upstream where source ='mini-buildd';
udd-dehs seems to use mole.watch, according to the code.
I would recommend switching to udd's upstream table, given it's also
used for DMD. So problems would be easier to notice.
Lucas
On 18/12/15 at 10:12 +0100, Raphael Hertzog wrote:
> Control: reassign -1 qa.debian.org
> Control: retitle -1 udd-dehs: Report wrong new upstream version for a native package
> Control: user qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Control: usertag -1 + udd
> Control: affects -1 tracker.debian.org
>
> Hello Lucas,
>
> is there any chance that you can fix the problem below? I don't know
> if you just need to drop old data or if you have to teach the tool to ignore
> old watch files...
>
> On Sat, 06 Dec 2014, Bart Martens wrote:
> > The same problem is on https://packages.qa.debian.org/m/mini-buildd.html .
> >
> > The output of https://qa.debian.org/cgi-bin/udd-dehs contains this:
> >
> > | debian-mangled-uversion: 0.8.20
> > | debian-uversion: 0.8.20
> > | messages: Not downloading as --package was used. Use --download to force downloading.
> > | package: mini-buildd
> > | status: Newer version available
> > | upstream-url: http://ftp.debian.org/debian/pool/main/m/mini-buildd/mini-buildd_1.0.0~alpha.8.tar.gz
> > | upstream-version: 1.0.0~alpha.8
> >
> > And mini-buildd 1.0.5 does not contain a debian/watch file (which is good!).
> >
> > Current versions of mini-buildd in Debian are:
> >
> > oldstable 0.8.15+nmu1
> > testing 1.0.5
> > unstable 1.0.5
> >
> > So the problem seems to be that UDD contains outdated information.
>
> --
> Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer
>
> Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
> Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
>
Reply to: