Re: rewrite of UDD importers runner
On Tue, Aug 18, 2015 at 03:41:08PM +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > Sounds sensible. Is there any way to define a sequence? In
> > scripts I defined
> >
> > cron_ftpnew_blends.sh
> >
> > which was calling three importers in the correct sequence. The
> > rationale is that later importers might be override citations that are
> > more up-to-date than by the importer before. Can your pool method
> > implement such a determined sequence?
>
> Can you elaborate on this? Shouldn't the whole sequence run in the same
> transaction if the intermediate state is invalid?
Strictly speaking this would be the optimal situation. The thing is
that different importers might provide citation data. Since the only
usage of this data is in the Blends rendering it could be triggered
accordingly I do not see an honest practical problem. If there would be
a simple solution to use one transaction that would be welcome, thought.
> > > - to add an importer, simply add it to rudd.conf.
> >
> > Is this somewhere outside of this mail documented?
>
> No but it's kind-of obvious, no?
I had two GSoC sponsees who had problem "obvious" things in UDD. :-)
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: