Your message dated Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:17:01 +0200 with message-id <20150616091701.GA24603@upsilon.cc> and subject line Re: Bug#788226: debsources: add package/version blacklist has caused the Debian Bug report #788226, regarding debsources: add package/version blacklist to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 788226: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=788226 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: debsources: add package/version blacklist
- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2015 17:03:06 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20150609150306.8061.51193.reportbug@timira.takhisis.invalid>
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: debsources It would be nice to have a configurable package/version (and possibly /suite) blacklist, to exclude specific packages from processing. Use case: due to #753219 and #787271, we now have katoob/0.5.9.1-1.2+squeeze1 and moodle/1.9.9.dfsg2-2.1+squeeze4 which are not extractable. But nonetheless the updater try to extract them at every single update run, and fails. It's not a big deal for such small packages, but if it were to happen for lager packages it would be a problem. A blacklist would allow to ignore specific packages during update runs. Cheers. -- System Information: Debian Release: stretch/sid APT prefers testing APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Foreign Architectures: i386 Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=it_IT.utf8, LC_CTYPE=it_IT.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 788226-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#788226: debsources: add package/version blacklist
- From: Stefano Zacchiroli <zack@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2015 11:17:01 +0200
- Message-id: <20150616091701.GA24603@upsilon.cc>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20150609150306.8061.51193.reportbug@timira.takhisis.invalid>
- References: <[🔎] 20150609150306.8061.51193.reportbug@timira.takhisis.invalid>
On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 05:03:06PM +0200, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > It would be nice to have a configurable package/version (and possibly /suite) > blacklist, to exclude specific packages from processing. > > Use case: due to #753219 and #787271, we now have katoob/0.5.9.1-1.2+squeeze1 > and moodle/1.9.9.dfsg2-2.1+squeeze4 which are not extractable. But nonetheless > the updater try to extract them at every single update run, and fails. It's > not a big deal for such small packages, but if it were to happen for lager > packages it would be a problem. > > A blacklist would allow to ignore specific packages during update runs. This has now been implemented in commit 02e5bdd00348943ee1526b77cc11e3639db1ec05, piggy backing on the already existing exclude.conf setting files, extending its semantics. See doc/exclude.txt for more information. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . . . . @zacchiro . . . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---