[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#788074: Mail delivery failed: returning message to sender

Package: tracker.debian.org
Severity: normal

The ‘tracker.debian.org’ email system is evidently handling message
transport for, at least, <foo@packages.debian.org> incoming email.
I think bug#754913 is the relevant request for that.

The transport is reportedtly failing, as I have received a whole lot
of bounce messages in response to an attempt several days ago to send
a message to numerous package maintainers. An example is attached to
this message.

But I have also received (some) automated responses indicating the
messages were delivered to maintainer end-point email addresses.

Is ‘tracker.debian.org’ currently duplicating the handling of incoming
<foo@packages.debian.org>? If so, it should resolve the duplication
and ensure only one system is doing it, correctly.

Attempting to respond to Mailer-Daemon, I have also received an error
from an unroutable internal domain; the undeliverable mail message is
also attached to this message. That is poor net behaviour; the sender
email address should be able to receive replies.

-- 
 \          “The best way to get information on Usenet is not to ask a |
  `\               question, but to post the wrong information.” —Aahz |
_o__)                                                                  |
Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>
--- Begin Message --- 
This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.

A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:

  cloudprint_contact@tracker.debian.org
    all hosts have been failing for a long time and were last tried after this message arrived

------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------

Return-path: <ben@benfinney.id.au>
Received: from quantz.debian.org ([2001:41c8:1000:21::21:28])
	from C=NA,ST=NA,L=Ankh Morpork,O=Debian SMTP,OU=Debian SMTP CA,CN=quantz.debian.org,EMAIL=hostmaster@quantz.debian.org (verified)
	by muffat.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
	(Exim 4.84)
	(envelope-from <ben@benfinney.id.au>)
	id 1Z0gex-00026k-JK
	for cloudprint_contact@tracker.debian.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 01:42:59 +0000
Received: from qa by quantz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.84)
	(envelope-from <ben@benfinney.id.au>)
	id 1Z0gew-000395-4K
	for cloudprint_contact@tracker.debian.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 01:42:58 +0000
Received: from picconi.debian.org ([2001:41c8:1000:21::21:3])
	from C=NA,ST=NA,L=Ankh Morpork,O=Debian SMTP,OU=Debian SMTP CA,CN=picconi.debian.org,EMAIL=hostmaster@picconi.debian.org (verified)
	by quantz.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
	(Exim 4.84)
	(envelope-from <ben@benfinney.id.au>)
	id 1Z0gew-00038w-13
	for cloudprint_contact@packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 01:42:58 +0000
Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28])
	by picconi.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.84)
	(envelope-from <ben@benfinney.id.au>)
	id 1Z0gev-0001Qq-3N
	for cloudprint@packages.debian.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 01:42:57 +0000
Received: from compute4.internal (compute4.nyi.internal [10.202.2.44])
	by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 255DF2193B
	for <cloudprint@packages.debian.org>; Thu,  4 Jun 2015 21:42:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
  by compute4.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Jun 2015 21:42:45 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
	messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id
	:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=nt
	7Bu/Q7PucbGl8m4mydaoDizUE=; b=lgtQxbk2hmhRKxWWP/ihiFaB2m1Enw+5Kn
	8Wl+G6emaXHTtTKneai/9z1zPhGQ4vcPnMLGKz8H4E81AJfasfidTbr+kfgY1jfJ
	25D/hmHLbXPpXw8WVGE4mNoQlQVjMcsSLAWE7REhqSXIAE+lyAiOtT+hv04p6TA9
	aMcccB6BE=
X-Sasl-enc: x0rxGTXl51RM5pd80tk+mXN9QS7xt7UdMQ4GXcOW8j39 1433468564
Received: from localhost (unknown [118.209.49.184])
	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 19DB0C0001E;
	Thu,  4 Jun 2015 21:42:43 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 11:42:41 +1000
From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>
To: bcfg2-server@packages.debian.org, calypso@packages.debian.org,
	cloudprint@packages.debian.org,
	lava-coordinator@packages.debian.org,
	lavapdu-daemon@packages.debian.org, lava-server@packages.debian.org,
	mini-buildd@packages.debian.org, pybit-common@packages.debian.org,
	pybit-watcher@packages.debian.org, pynslcd@packages.debian.org,
	python-cinder@packages.debian.org,
	python-ftp-cloudfs@packages.debian.org,
	python-gear@packages.debian.org, python-lamson@packages.debian.org,
	python-nova@packages.debian.org, sftpcloudfs@packages.debian.org,
	yhsm-yubikey-ksm@packages.debian.org
Subject: Incompatible API coming, in =?utf-8?B?4oCc?=
 =?utf-8?B?cHl0aG9uLWRhZW1vbiA+PSAy4oCd?=
Message-ID: <20150605014240.GH18081@benfinney.id.au>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qM81t570OJUP5TU/"
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Public-Key-ID: 0xAC128405
X-Public-Key-Fingerprint: 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35  4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405
X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-pubkey.asc
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Delivered-To: cloudprint@packages.debian.org
Delivered-To: cloudprint_contact@packages.qa.debian.org


--qM81t570OJUP5TU/
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Howdy,

You are maintaining a package with a dependency on =E2=80=98python-daemon=
=E2=80=99. In
turn, this brings a dependency on =E2=80=98python-lockfile=E2=80=99.

Debian's package =E2=80=98python-lockfile=E2=80=99 has recently updated to =
one with a
backward-incompatible API. (In summary: exported names in the API have
changed, and dependent code must change accordingly. See its changelog
for more detail.)

The =E2=80=98python-daemon=E2=80=99 code has changed in many ways since the=
 version
1.5.x series. The 2.x series now depends on the current
=E2=80=98python-lockfile=E2=80=99 API, and it is that version of =E2=80=98p=
ython-daemon=E2=80=99 which
will be soon uploaded to Debian.

Please check the package you maintain to see whether it is compatible
with upstream =E2=80=98python-daemon=E2=80=99 version 2 or later.

If the package is compatible only with earlier =E2=80=98python-daemon=E2=80=
=99
versions, I recommend declaring this in the package metadata. A field
=E2=80=9CDepends: python-daemon (<=3D 1.6)=E2=80=9D would be good.

If there is an upstream version of your package that is compatible
*only* with =E2=80=98python-daemon=E2=80=99 version 2 or later, please pack=
age that
version with =E2=80=9CDepends: python-daemon (>=3D 2)=E2=80=9D.

The backward-incompatible =E2=80=98python-daemon=E2=80=99 will likely be up=
loaded into
Debian within a few weeks.

Please let me wknow if you need assistance with this issue.

--=20
 \       =E2=80=9CTo have the choice between proprietary software packages,=
 is |
  `\      being able to choose your master. Freedom means not having a |
_o__)                        master.=E2=80=9D =E2=80=94Richard M. Stallman,=
 2007-05-16 |
Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>

--qM81t570OJUP5TU/
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=PV0s
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--qM81t570OJUP5TU/--

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
This is the mail system at host mailout.nyi.internal.

I'm sorry to have to inform you that your message could not
be delivered to one or more recipients. It's attached below.

For further assistance, please send mail to postmaster.

If you do so, please include this problem report. You can
delete your own text from the attached returned message.

                   The mail system

<Mailer-Daemon@muffat.debian.org>: host muffat.debian.org[206.12.19.146] said:
    550 Unrouteable address (in reply to RCPT TO command)

Reporting-MTA: dns; mailout.nyi.internal
X-Postfix-Queue-ID: 3F26020C32
X-Postfix-Sender: rfc822; ben@benfinney.id.au
Arrival-Date: Mon,  8 Jun 2015 07:03:30 -0400 (EDT)

Final-Recipient: rfc822; Mailer-Daemon@muffat.debian.org
Original-Recipient: rfc822;Mailer-Daemon@muffat.debian.org
Action: failed
Status: 5.0.0
Remote-MTA: dns; muffat.debian.org
Diagnostic-Code: smtp; 550 Unrouteable address
--- Begin Message --- 
I received this message (and over a dozen others) today, but was not
intending messages to go through ‘tracker.debian.org’.

I have *also* received some messages that suggested messages were
delivered correctly to (some of) these addresses.

Is ‘tracker.debian.org’ doing double duty on email delivery? Is it
attempting to also deliver messages that are delivered by another mail
system?


On 08-Jun-2015, Mail Delivery System wrote:
> This message was created automatically by mail delivery software.
> 
> A message that you sent could not be delivered to one or more of its
> recipients. This is a permanent error. The following address(es) failed:
> 
>   bcfg2_contact@tracker.debian.org
>     all hosts have been failing for a long time and were last tried after this message arrived
> 
> ------ This is a copy of the message, including all the headers. ------
> 
> Return-path: <ben@benfinney.id.au>
> Received: from quantz.debian.org ([2001:41c8:1000:21::21:28])
> 	from C=NA,ST=NA,L=Ankh Morpork,O=Debian SMTP,OU=Debian SMTP CA,CN=quantz.debian.org,EMAIL=hostmaster@quantz.debian.org (verified)
> 	by muffat.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
> 	(Exim 4.84)
> 	(envelope-from <ben@benfinney.id.au>)
> 	id 1Z0geu-00026N-VU
> 	for bcfg2_contact@tracker.debian.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 01:42:57 +0000
> Received: from qa by quantz.debian.org with local (Exim 4.84)
> 	(envelope-from <ben@benfinney.id.au>)
> 	id 1Z0get-00036b-H9
> 	for bcfg2_contact@tracker.debian.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 01:42:55 +0000
> Received: from picconi.debian.org ([2001:41c8:1000:21::21:3])
> 	from C=NA,ST=NA,L=Ankh Morpork,O=Debian SMTP,OU=Debian SMTP CA,CN=picconi.debian.org,EMAIL=hostmaster@picconi.debian.org (verified)
> 	by quantz.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128)
> 	(Exim 4.84)
> 	(envelope-from <ben@benfinney.id.au>)
> 	id 1Z0get-00036P-Ej
> 	for bcfg2_contact@packages.qa.debian.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 01:42:55 +0000
> Received: from out4-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.28])
> 	by picconi.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
> 	(Exim 4.84)
> 	(envelope-from <ben@benfinney.id.au>)
> 	id 1Z0ges-0001QE-MS
> 	for bcfg2-server@packages.debian.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 01:42:55 +0000
> Received: from compute3.internal (compute3.nyi.internal [10.202.2.43])
> 	by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A0BC2193F
> 	for <bcfg2-server@packages.debian.org>; Thu,  4 Jun 2015 21:42:44 -0400 (EDT)
> Received: from frontend1 ([10.202.2.160])
>   by compute3.internal (MEProxy); Thu, 04 Jun 2015 21:42:45 -0400
> DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=
> 	messagingengine.com; h=content-type:date:from:message-id
> 	:mime-version:subject:to:x-sasl-enc:x-sasl-enc; s=smtpout; bh=nt
> 	7Bu/Q7PucbGl8m4mydaoDizUE=; b=lgtQxbk2hmhRKxWWP/ihiFaB2m1Enw+5Kn
> 	8Wl+G6emaXHTtTKneai/9z1zPhGQ4vcPnMLGKz8H4E81AJfasfidTbr+kfgY1jfJ
> 	25D/hmHLbXPpXw8WVGE4mNoQlQVjMcsSLAWE7REhqSXIAE+lyAiOtT+hv04p6TA9
> 	aMcccB6BE=
> X-Sasl-enc: x0rxGTXl51RM5pd80tk+mXN9QS7xt7UdMQ4GXcOW8j39 1433468564
> Received: from localhost (unknown [118.209.49.184])
> 	by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 19DB0C0001E;
> 	Thu,  4 Jun 2015 21:42:43 -0400 (EDT)
> Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 11:42:41 +1000
> From: Ben Finney <ben+debian@benfinney.id.au>
> To: bcfg2-server@packages.debian.org, calypso@packages.debian.org,
> 	cloudprint@packages.debian.org,
> 	lava-coordinator@packages.debian.org,
> 	lavapdu-daemon@packages.debian.org, lava-server@packages.debian.org,
> 	mini-buildd@packages.debian.org, pybit-common@packages.debian.org,
> 	pybit-watcher@packages.debian.org, pynslcd@packages.debian.org,
> 	python-cinder@packages.debian.org,
> 	python-ftp-cloudfs@packages.debian.org,
> 	python-gear@packages.debian.org, python-lamson@packages.debian.org,
> 	python-nova@packages.debian.org, sftpcloudfs@packages.debian.org,
> 	yhsm-yubikey-ksm@packages.debian.org
> Subject: Incompatible API coming, in =?utf-8?B?4oCc?=
>  =?utf-8?B?cHl0aG9uLWRhZW1vbiA+PSAy4oCd?=
> Message-ID: <20150605014240.GH18081@benfinney.id.au>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256;
> 	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="qM81t570OJUP5TU/"
> Content-Disposition: inline
> X-Public-Key-ID: 0xAC128405
> X-Public-Key-Fingerprint: 517C F14B B2F3 98B0 CB35  4855 B8B2 4C06 AC12 8405
> X-Public-Key-URL: http://www.benfinney.id.au/contact/bfinney-pubkey.asc
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
> Delivered-To: bcfg2-server@packages.debian.org
> Delivered-To: bcfg2_contact@packages.qa.debian.org
> 
> 
> --qM81t570OJUP5TU/
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
> Content-Disposition: inline
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> 
> Howdy,
> 
> You are maintaining a package with a dependency on =E2=80=98python-daemon=
> =E2=80=99. In
> turn, this brings a dependency on =E2=80=98python-lockfile=E2=80=99.
> 
> Debian's package =E2=80=98python-lockfile=E2=80=99 has recently updated to =
> one with a
> backward-incompatible API. (In summary: exported names in the API have
> changed, and dependent code must change accordingly. See its changelog
> for more detail.)
> 
> The =E2=80=98python-daemon=E2=80=99 code has changed in many ways since the=
>  version
> 1.5.x series. The 2.x series now depends on the current
> =E2=80=98python-lockfile=E2=80=99 API, and it is that version of =E2=80=98p=
> ython-daemon=E2=80=99 which
> will be soon uploaded to Debian.
> 
> Please check the package you maintain to see whether it is compatible
> with upstream =E2=80=98python-daemon=E2=80=99 version 2 or later.
> 
> If the package is compatible only with earlier =E2=80=98python-daemon=E2=80=
> =99
> versions, I recommend declaring this in the package metadata. A field
> =E2=80=9CDepends: python-daemon (<=3D 1.6)=E2=80=9D would be good.
> 
> If there is an upstream version of your package that is compatible
> *only* with =E2=80=98python-daemon=E2=80=99 version 2 or later, please pack=
> age that
> version with =E2=80=9CDepends: python-daemon (>=3D 2)=E2=80=9D.
> 
> The backward-incompatible =E2=80=98python-daemon=E2=80=99 will likely be up=
> loaded into
> Debian within a few weeks.
> 
> Please let me wknow if you need assistance with this issue.
> 
> --=20
>  \       =E2=80=9CTo have the choice between proprietary software packages,=
>  is |
>   `\      being able to choose your master. Freedom means not having a |
> _o__)                        master.=E2=80=9D =E2=80=94Richard M. Stallman,=
>  2007-05-16 |
> Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>
> 
> --qM81t570OJUP5TU/
> Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
> Content-Description: Digital signature
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
> 
> iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVcP6QAAoJEAYg8N1oQWlFj3UP/i9W6ezGQ49sNVrV2+1A06ex
> 6cEMOOgtgJeX/DevVZ894kJ2r+bEzufEYpivf0chEz+Kn3qWi2b/worMSWFKKzWP
> o8GXsA+pzHTEDHGTerOuyy2N6GIG/msdSLaI34OFgjo13jB7GhNC6I6aXv8M+0jy
> /OPhCE4EoBISpqIGXcoNz5vuzhMRxd6zkFreLS3qNnjdFW237l5QEiwP5lFcX6s1
> HiouWjJHR7woHoDrDld4YwuQAsHjeXNBSaVUNPImoEqdTAxj+PVJzoY1oFP2C/qY
> nauzg4jVGl2iV1qL7TrpZDvEcYwL50oAl//5BG/XvTbmnBrSDxBCevBVlpuF2n9Z
> zJoHWJNrU8YaW7ceClTN2WLJdNrqeiBGq3Z+8AdGAIwxP7gjAro5j9fluAbctEIt
> WPYar/AKidjaBBIuzded/jmGJx3mEcBUGAfYmvGxvBQZNpAm7uqX/jE0nv01ev3m
> rQRevmYH+1CWNjf7cWcOegqEGi+S6Z4hRvW2kZz6smjVIDYH9cXiDPu0XxXqagYN
> kVTIQtyscl2r0CxjPrpN+sZRGxbwin1fgt1OuLSxkllYDjXiRK9z4Y4MAvYOg2B5
> HS3mnz9bsRCbB2mnDhuQiDMo6RbmKmhhCcie6p5eU0QX9COV9ocdKGvtZcDwprYm
> Bh4nE2iXPP/gTbYSeYqP
> =PV0s
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> --qM81t570OJUP5TU/--
> 

-- 
 \        “I have a microwave fireplace in my house. The other night I |
  `\   laid down in front of the fire for the evening in two minutes.” |
_o__)                                                   —Steven Wright |
Ben Finney <ben@benfinney.id.au>

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---

--- End Message ---

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: