[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#748223: marked as done (UDD: uscan doesn't understand pgpsigurlmangle)

Your message dated Fri, 17 Apr 2015 15:47:47 +0200
with message-id <20150417134747.GA11942@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#748223: [olasd@debian.org: UDD's DEHS reimplementation, FTP upstreams and GPG signature checking]
has caused the Debian Bug report #748223,
regarding UDD: uscan doesn't understand pgpsigurlmangle
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
748223: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=748223
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal

Dear Maintainer,
there is some problem with watch checks.

It this dmd query:

http://udd.debian.org/dmd/?email1=&email2=&email3=&packages=node-jsconfig+node-jsdom+node-postgres+pdf.js+rainbow.js+step.js+wax.js&ignpackages=&format=html#todo

packages node-jsconfig, node-jsdom, node-postgres, pdf.js,
rainbow.js, step.js, wax.js report "error" in the upstream column.

While, according with PTS page, watch check is fine:

 * http://packages.qa.debian.org/node-jsconfig
 * http://packages.qa.debian.org/node-jsdom
 * http://packages.qa.debian.org/node-postgres
 * http://packages.qa.debian.org/pdf.js
 * http://packages.qa.debian.org/rainbow.js
 * http://packages.qa.debian.org/step.js
 * http://packages.qa.debian.org/wax.js


Regards,

Leo.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.13.0-24-generic (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 20/03/15 at 09:08 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> On 18/03/15 at 17:59 +0100, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > retitle 748223 UDD: uscan doesn't understand pgpsigurlmangle
> > thanks
> > 
> > On 20/05/14 at 07:47 +0200, Lucas Nussbaum wrote:
> > > UDD's DEHS reimplementation seems to fail for two distinct usecases: FTP
> > > connections that need active mode are failing (for instance a lot of the KDE
> > > team watch files are failing), and the uscan version installed on ullmann
> > > doesn't understand the gpg signature checking and fails with an error. Both
> > > those issues make the (very useful) DMD a bit redder than necessary.
> > > 
> > > The first issue can be solved two ways: enabling the conntrack on ftp
> > > connections in the firewall, or adding --pasv to the uscan invocation (which
> > > will fail if the ftp server doesn't support passive mode, but that's a bit
> > > crazy anyway).
> > 
> > --pasv added to the uscan call, so this is fixed now.
> > 
> > > The second issue would be fixed by using a backported uscan on ullmann. That
> > > might have other ramifications though, and I can't clean up afterwards so I
> > > won't request it directly.
> > 
> > This only fails for 82 packages, according to:
> > select source, warnings from upstream where warnings ~ 'pgp' and status = 'error';
> > This will be magically fixed when ullmann will be upgraded to jessie.
> > (just copying the uscan script from a jessie system doesn't work, as it
> > also uses some stuff from the devscripts lib)
> 
> Small progress here:
> a backported uscan was installed on ullmann.
> Now the gatherer needs to be modified to store upstream/signing-key.asc

As far as I know, all problems mentioned in this bug report were fixed
in UDD (with the use of a backported devscripts, and some changes to the
importer to include the keyring).

Please open separate bugs if you find issues with this code.

Lucas

--- End Message ---
Reply to: