Bug#776521: marked as done (UDD can think removed packages are still in testing/unstable)
Your message dated Sat, 31 Jan 2015 11:41:01 -0500
with message-id <CANTw=MMjwy_RE9YzMX09Y7yGsTJ3dZ8bQtHTtT7pjoioV6vjkA@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#776521: UDD can think removed packages are still in testing/unstable
has caused the Debian Bug report #776521,
regarding UDD can think removed packages are still in testing/unstable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
776521: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=776521
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
UDD thinks src:eglibc is still in testing/unstable, but it's been
removed for a while, so it shouldn't show up in the RC bug list:
https://udd.debian.org/bugs/bugs/?release=jessie_and_sid&patch=ign&merged=ign&done=ign&rc=1
The old PTS also thinks the same:
http://packages.qa.debian.org/eglibc
But the new PTS doesn't:
http://tracker.debian.org/pkg/eglibc
Best wishes,
Mike
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> This is (yet) another instance of the fact that the Sources file for
> unstable and testing does include eglibc, but tagged as
> Extra-Source-Only:yes. That's due to the fact that the version of
> debian-installer-netboot-images currently in those suites declares a
> Built-Using relationship on eglibc (as they were built on wheezy and
> then propagated during a point release).
In the meantime eglibc was removed from unstable's Sources file, and I
suppose that will transition to jessie's Sources soon too, so it's
really no longer an issue.
Best wishes,
Mike
--- End Message ---
Reply to: