Your message dated Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:34:44 +0100 with message-id <20150129133444.GA9292@home.ouaza.com> and subject line Re: Bug#739497: reproducible.json now exists has caused the Debian Bug report #739497, regarding PTS: reproducible builds links to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 739497: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739497 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: bts <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: PTS: reproducible builds links
- From: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2014 20:08:26 +0800
- Message-id: <1392811706.6589.40.camel@chianamo>
Package: qa.debian.org Severity: wishlist User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: pts X-Debbugs-CC: reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org Some folks are working on reproducible builds[1] for Debian. Currently they are working through all the issues and filing bugs[2]. I was thinking it might scale better if all Debian maintainers were made aware when their package is not reproducibly buildable. One way to do that is to add TODO items to the PTS so that maintainers can see before they upload if there are things they could do to make their package buildable reproducibly. The PTS could also link to a common issues page on the wiki where people can document issues they find and the solutions. I am willing to do the PTS side of this but I need a machine-readable index of packages that are not reproducibly buildable and a way to link to further information for each package and further general information on the wiki or elsewhere. The index format can be JSON, YAML or just plain text with one package per line plus a URL pattern for linking. 1. https://wiki.debian.org/ReproducibleBuilds 2. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?usertag=reproducible-builds@lists.alioth.debian.org -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWiseAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Paul Wise <pabs@debian.org>
- Cc: 739497-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#739497: reproducible.json now exists
- From: Raphael Hertzog <hertzog@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2015 14:34:44 +0100
- Message-id: <20150129133444.GA9292@home.ouaza.com>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 1422440258.17727.15.camel@debian.org>
- References: <201411072248.06261.holger@layer-acht.org> <1417056546.13452.6.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] 1421745478.1232.26.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] 1421759608.3412.2.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] 20150125172651.GA13944@home.ouaza.com> <[🔎] 1422440258.17727.15.camel@debian.org>
Hi, On Wed, 28 Jan 2015, Paul Wise wrote: > > known ? In fact you probably want to create it the new action_item only > > after that test too! Or given that you delete obsolete action items later, > > you might want to do this check first (or outside of the function). > > Hmm, I got the impression action items that weren't saved didn't need to > be explicitly deleted. Anyway, moved the check to the top. For new action items, obviously, for pre-existing ones it's different. > Updated patch attached. The only remaining issues (that flake8 run via tox reported to me) is that quite a few lines were longer than 80 characters. I fixed those, pushed and deployed to tracker.debian.org. Thanks! -- Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/
--- End Message ---