On Tue, 2014-09-16 at 16:42 +0200, Thijs Kinkhorst wrote: > Not sure what you'd use that additional info for As I said perhaps less clearly in another mail, two things: To list a link to the security tracker in the right-hand-side links section for packages with (any) security issues, as we do for packages with pedantic lintian complaints. To list a link to the security tracker in the right-hand-side links section for packages with a history of security issues, because this would be interesting for users trying to decide to use a package and also for developers deciding if they want to adopt a package or reintroduce a package that was removed. > packages lead to semi-permanent notice of issues I definitely wouldn't put them in the central 'action needed' column. -- bye, pabs http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part