Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata

To: debian-qa@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata
From: Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu>
Date: Wed, 3 Sep 2014 11:57:25 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20140903095725.GL23628@an3as.eu>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 5406A56F.8070305@familiekainz.at>
References: <[🔎] 540630E3.9060404@familiekainz.at> <[🔎] 540686FD.5070200@debian.org> <[🔎] 5406A56F.8070305@familiekainz.at>

On Wed, Sep 03, 2014 at 07:21:51AM +0200, Simon Kainz wrote:
> ...
> But, maybe i got this completely wrong....

... or it is not the best idea to duplicate data at different places.

Kind regards

     Andreas.

-- 
http://fam-tille.de

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata
  - From: Charles Plessy <plessy@debian.org>

References:
- Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata
  - From: Simon Kainz <simon@familiekainz.at>
- Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata
  - From: David Prévot <taffit@debian.org>
- Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata
  - From: Simon Kainz <simon@familiekainz.at>

Prev by Date: Bug#756117: Resurrecting patch-tracker.d.o
Next by Date: Bug#760382: tracker.debian.org: versions section shows versions already passed through NEW queue
Previous by thread: Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata
Next by thread: Re: Differences between fields in debian/control and upstream-metadata
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread