Bug#773665: marked as done (DMD: misleading "already in experimental, but not in unstable")
Your message dated Tue, 23 Dec 2014 09:08:35 +0100
with message-id <20141223080835.GA24662@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#773665: DMD: misleading "already in experimental, but not in unstable"
has caused the Debian Bug report #773665,
regarding DMD: misleading "already in experimental, but not in unstable"
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
773665: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=773665
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: minor
https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?packages=afl#todo says "New upstream version
available: 0.93b (already in experimental, but not in unstable)". But
there's only afl 0.90b in the archive, so 0.93b is not "already in
experimental".
--
Jakub Wilk
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 21/12/14 at 20:46 +0100, Jakub Wilk wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: minor
>
> https://udd.debian.org/dmd/?packages=afl#todo says "New upstream version
> available: 0.93b (already in experimental, but not in unstable)". But
> there's only afl 0.90b in the archive, so 0.93b is not "already in
> experimental".
Thanks for noticing. Fixed.
- Lucas
--- End Message ---
Reply to: