[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#753683: tracker.debian.org: '1 bug tagged help in the BTS', but no bug is open



[ Reordering the paragraph ]

On Tue, 02 Dec 2014, Don Armstrong wrote:
> > So should I use "source" as a base and then restrict to the set of
> > source packages available in "found_versions" (if any)?
> 
> It depends on what you're using that field for. If you're using it to
> show a set of bugs which may potentially be relevant to a package, then
> just show everything which is in source. If you only want to show those
> bugs which are currently found, then that's a totally different question
> which requires asking the BTS about specific versions of the source
> package (or binary packages).

So let me explain, we use the BTS soap interface to retrieve a list of
bugs tagged "help" which are not closed yet. Then we assign those bugs
to source packages and display a message "heh you have X bugs tagged
help" and give a link of the form
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?src=ffmpeg&tag=help&pend-exc=done

In this report, the above linked showed nothing while the status of the
bug 704070 was this (dropping irrelevant fiels):

found	libav/6:0.8.5-1 => 
pending	pending
package	ffmpeg
keywords	help wontfix
severity	minor
source	ffmpeg, ffmpeg-debian, ffmpeg-free, libav
tags	help wontfix
found_versions	libav/6:0.8.5-1

> > Well, the BTS is inconsistent then. Because it lists all sources
> > packages here but the bug did not show up in the list of bugs affected
> > against the "ffmpeg" source package, which is what got reported to us
> > in the first place.
> 
> That's a different question. The bug would be in state "absent" for
> ffmpeg, but it would have shown up in ffmpeg's bug list. [Or at least,
> it should have.]

(This can no longer be reproduced with this specific bug since it got
reassigned in the mean time)

Apparently that was not the case (cf above).

> > And as I said, the individual bug page also doesn't show up all
> > sources packages.
> 
> Which page are we talking about?

https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704070

(again now it's irrelevant since the only associated source is now libav
due to the reassign)

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Support Debian LTS: http://www.freexian.com/services/debian-lts.html
Learn to master Debian: http://debian-handbook.info/get/


Reply to: