[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Should twitter-bootstrap be RoQA'd?

On Sat, Nov 1, 2014 at 10:31 PM, Christian Kastner wrote:

> perhaps removing twitter-bootstrap [2]

You'll need to get all of the reverse dependencies to migrate first.

$ ssh mirror.ftp-master.debian.org dak rm -s unstable -Rn twitter-bootstrap
Will remove the following packages from unstable:

libjs-twitter-bootstrap | 2.0.2+dfsg-5 | all
libjs-twitter-bootstrap-docs | 2.0.2+dfsg-5 | all
twitter-bootstrap | 2.0.2+dfsg-5 | source

Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org>

------------------- Reason -------------------


Checking reverse dependencies...
# Broken Depends:
djangorestframework: python-djangorestframework
doctrine-sphinx-theme: doctrine-sphinx-theme
flower: python-flower
haproxy: haproxy-doc
libjs-twitter-bootstrap-datepicker: libjs-twitter-bootstrap-datepicker
nikola: nikola
nzbget: nzbget
owncloud-doc: owncloud-doc
php-codecoverage: php-codecoverage
plinth: plinth
ruby-sidekiq: ruby-sidekiq
salt: salt-doc
varnish-agent: varnish-agent [amd64 i386]
webdeveloper: xul-ext-webdeveloper

# Broken Build-Depends:
flower: libjs-twitter-bootstrap
ngrok: libjs-twitter-bootstrap
php-codecoverage: libjs-twitter-bootstrap
plinth: libjs-twitter-bootstrap
ruby-sidekiq: libjs-twitter-bootstrap



Reply to: