[ quoted text edit to add references ] On Tue, Sep 16, 2014 at 11:39:13PM +0800, Paul Wise wrote: > 1) When only one binary package, use the description from it. > > 2) When more than one binary package but one has the same name as the > source package, use the description from that. > > 3) Otherwise, use "source package". Uhm, interesting, I always thought the heuristic was slightly difference. Is there an argument for not replacing point (3) above with: (3*) Otherwise, use the description of the first binary in debian/control order My gut feeling is that (2) is enough to counter most of the misleading results that (3*) alone would produce. Cheers. -- Stefano Zacchiroli . . . . . . . zack@upsilon.cc . . . . o . . . o . o Maître de conférences . . . . . http://upsilon.cc/zack . . . o . . . o o Former Debian Project Leader . . @zack on identi.ca . . o o o . . . o . « the first rule of tautology club is the first rule of tautology club »
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature