Re: Limiting piuparts results in DDPO
Re: Holger Levsen 2014-05-24 <email@example.com>
> why is this private between the three of us? Reply to -firstname.lastname@example.org please....
> On Samstag, 24. Mai 2014, Christoph Berg wrote:
> > I think the status as shown in DDPO should be more detailed, like the
> > debcheck results do. Many maintainers will want to handle problems in
> > unstable with higher priority than in stable, so if most of their "F"
> > are for dists they are less interested in, they'd probably ignore the
> > piuparts column pretty quickly. The overall status is only interesting
> > if it's "all ok".
> do you have an example showing this?
> > So it will probably make sense to directly show where the problem(s)
> > are. I guess it's a bit harder for piuparts than for debcheck because
> > it also checks upgrades, so there'd be S, S2T, T, U, ... results.
> > (Oldstable plus O2S should probably not appear there at all, as few
> > people are going to care.)
email@example.com | http://www.df7cb.de/