Bug#739681: marked as done (qa.debian.org: Debian Maintainer Dashboard: out-of-date data in the VCS column)
Your message dated Sat, 22 Feb 2014 13:42:37 +0100
with message-id <20140222124237.GA6927@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#739681: qa.debian.org: Debian Maintainer Dashboard: out-of-date data in the VCS column
has caused the Debian Bug report #739681,
regarding qa.debian.org: Debian Maintainer Dashboard: out-of-date data in the VCS column
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
739681: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739681
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: udd
Hi,
since a few months (possibly more), the VCS column on my dashboard
page has been displaying outdated information. E.g. it believes that
the VCS for libtest-bdd-cucumber-perl only has 0.15-1 "Ready for
upload to unstable", while it really has 0.17-1, just like the
testing/sid archive.
Thanks for the DMD! :)
Cheers,
--
intrigeri
| GnuPG key @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/intrigeri.asc
| OTR fingerprint @ https://gaffer.ptitcanardnoir.org/intrigeri/otr.asc
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 21/02/14 at 11:09 +0100, intrigeri@debian.org wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: qa.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: udd
>
> Hi,
>
> since a few months (possibly more), the VCS column on my dashboard
> page has been displaying outdated information. E.g. it believes that
> the VCS for libtest-bdd-cucumber-perl only has 0.15-1 "Ready for
> upload to unstable", while it really has 0.17-1, just like the
> testing/sid archive.
>
> Thanks for the DMD! :)
Hi!
Yes, UDD needed to be updated after the PET move to d.o infra.
Done now, thanks for the reminder!
Lucas
--- End Message ---
Reply to: