[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#728837: marked as done (UDD: bugs.cgi: excluding bugs that are fixed in experimental)



Your message dated Sun, 24 Nov 2013 12:02:57 +0100
with message-id <20131124110257.GA9697@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#728837: UDD: bugs.cgi: excluding bugs that are fixed in experimental
has caused the Debian Bug report #728837,
regarding UDD: bugs.cgi: excluding bugs that are fixed in experimental
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
728837: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=728837
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: wishlist

Hi,

it would be helpful to have a way to exclude bugs that are fixed in
experimental (derived from version information, not the ancient
fixed-in-experimental tag) (or do other things with experiental fixage)
Packages that have no version in experimental should be treated
"correctly" (fsvo correctly) 

e.g. for this cleaning view [1] that I used recently for fixing up ancient
bugs to be archivable would have been more helpful if I could exclude
packages fixed in experimental ... pseudo-sql expression:

  select any bug that affects sid
  where status == done
  and last modified is more than 4 weeks ago
  and there are no outdated binaries in sid
  *** and the bug is not fixed in experimental ***


Andreas

[1] http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=sid&merged=ign&done=only&outdatedsid=ign&fnewerval=7&flastmod=ign&flastmodval=30&allbugs=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&ctags=1&cdeferred=1&caffected=1

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 06/11/13 at 04:47 +0100, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: wishlist
> 
> Hi,
> 
> it would be helpful to have a way to exclude bugs that are fixed in
> experimental (derived from version information, not the ancient
> fixed-in-experimental tag) (or do other things with experiental fixage)
> Packages that have no version in experimental should be treated
> "correctly" (fsvo correctly) 
> 
> e.g. for this cleaning view [1] that I used recently for fixing up ancient
> bugs to be archivable would have been more helpful if I could exclude
> packages fixed in experimental ... pseudo-sql expression:
> 
>   select any bug that affects sid
>   where status == done
>   and last modified is more than 4 weeks ago
>   and there are no outdated binaries in sid
>   *** and the bug is not fixed in experimental ***

Hi,

I've fixed this in a slightly different way. I've affected a 'ē' tag in
the list of affected releases that means 'package is in experimental,
but not affected'.

This can be viewed on
http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi?release=jessie_and_sid&merged=ign&done=only&fnewerval=7&rc=1&sortby=id&sorto=asc&ctags=1&cdeferred=1&caffected=1

It only allows for "visual filtering".

Adding a "affects jessie but not experimental" is a bit harder due to
the current spaghetti-based design.

Please reopen of this is not enough for your use case.

Lucas

--- End Message ---

Reply to: