[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: DUCK Status update, RFC



On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 03:49:43PM +0100, Simon Kainz wrote:
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hi Pabs, hi qa team.
> 
> Current development instance is here: (showing data from partials runs,
> so expect strange results, but the leftmost column is real),
> 
> 
> http://zidpc9027.tugraz.at/duck/index.php
> 
> I added the checks for SVN repos, which now leads to ~2700 binary
> packages with issues.
> 
> SVN checks are done via svn info, which seems to work quite well,
> 
> e.g. http://zidpc9027.tugraz.at/duck/index.php?searchstring=pabs
> 
> 
> To link to a specific package(from PTS), you may now use
> 
> the parameter package=<packagename> like this:
> 
> http://zidpc9027.tugraz.at/duck/index.php?package=xtermset
> 
> I am currently thinking about a way to check (amongst other vcs systems)
> git repos, without cloning the full repo - maybe just fetch some file
> from inside the repo? Someone has some idea how this might be done?
> Basically bandwith is no issue, but it seems a bit overkill to me, to
> _really_ check out git repos.
> 
> And yes, i know i still have to work in the design.
> 
> This is still work in development, so please be kind ;-) and please give
> me feedback.

As I asked in <CAO6P2QRVKcT5EmvHM=FjzbPehh6EEyuaNwRCVPbd7gSWR_gy7g@mail.gmail.com>
and (in private) <20120625160108.GA24517@chayot> -- is the source
published yet? :)

> 
> Simon

-T

> 
> 
> Am 12/30/12 08:29, schrieb Paul Wise:
> > On Sun, 2012-12-30 at 07:41 +0100, Simon Kainz wrote:
> >
> >> just to let you know i am working on it:
> >>
> >> http://zidpc9027.tugraz.at/duck/index.php?format=plain
> >>
> >> now shows the list in plaintext format which is the way we discussed it
> >> some time ago. Please remember, this is development only.
> >
> > Excellent, please let me know when it is deployed.
> >
> >> Concerning VCS-* fields: Currently you show the "The upstream URL(s)
> >> for this package had some issues for the past 5 days. " string on the
> >> PTS. When I am now starting to add the VCS-* statii, do you think it's
> >> better to keep them separate, allowing another line like "VCS had some
> >> issues in the past .. days?"
> >
> > Hmm. Vcs-Browser fields are not for the upstream VCS, but the Debian
> > one. So I should remove "upstream" from that message. I think we should
> > just have one message for all URLs, makes it easier to have in the PTS.
> >
> >> Or should I just throw all data together and return just one good/bad
> >> state? But i think we should prefer the former way, as I will also try
> >> to incorporate Upstream metadata, so the whole thing might get too flaky
> >> for sane results.
> >
> > I prefer one good/bad status for all the URLs to keep the PTS simple. If
> > you want to also add more reports containing status for each URL, that
> > might be useful for things like UDD.
> >
> > I think we should discuss DUCK on the debian-qa list from now on,
> > instead of in private mail. Is that OK for you? Are you subscribed?
> >
> > You might want to consider not using PHP any more:
> >
> > http://me.veekun.com/blog/2012/04/09/php-a-fractal-of-bad-design/
> >
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://www.enigmail.net/
> 
> iEYEARECAAYFAlDkSQAACgkQEtt57sR2O6XeXQCglzy3DMgQRQTQI/JbYAc3BRYo
> n/IAn0MM8S9LrmYQUWFxjuUzn3PLrNgC
> =jRUW
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-qa-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 50E44907.9060502@familiekainz.at">http://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 50E44907.9060502@familiekainz.at
> 

-- 
 .''`.  Paul Tagliamonte <paultag@debian.org>
: :'  : Proud Debian Developer
`. `'`  4096R / 8F04 9AD8 2C92 066C 7352  D28A 7B58 5B30 807C 2A87
 `-     http://people.debian.org/~paultag

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: