On Sat, 2013-08-17 at 12:16 +0200, Giovanni Mascellani wrote: > Personally I'd prefer to have the link for all packages rebuilt with > clang, but do as you wish. Could you explain why knowing that a package is Needs-Build for clang based builds is useful to you? Needs-Build is useful for the official gcc based buildds because this state has other effects on the package, like not being able to transition to testing. For the clang based builds, clicking on the clang link just to find out that the clang-based buildds haven't yet built it is basically a waste of maintainer time as far as I can tell. The PTS has traditionally tried to avoid doing that. Any opinions from other folks? -- bye, pabs http://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part