[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#704062: marked as done (Package Tracking System: package name window rejects leading blanks in package name)

Your message dated Mon, 27 May 2013 04:48:10 +0000
with message-id <E1UgpLu-0000gp-SI@vasks.debian.org>
and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 3013
has caused the Debian Bug report #704026,
regarding Package Tracking System: package name window rejects leading blanks in package name
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
704026: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=704026
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: qa.debian.org

PTS  fails to find a package if there are leading blanks in the
package entry window (easy to do if if copying and pasting).

On the main PTS page, in the package window, I enter a package name,
e.g., " reportbug" (without quotes, note the leading blank space) and
the following page is returned:

<quote>
Error 404

I'm sorry, the page that you asked doesn't exist :
404 File not found
Maybe you've made a mistake and the package you're looking for does
not (or no longer) exist
</quote>

When I enter the same name without a leading space, the package site
page is returned successfully.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Version: 3013

This bug was closed by Paul Wise (pabs) in SVN revision 3013.
Note that it might take some time until the qa.debian.org code has
been updated and cronjobs have picked up changed data.

Commit message:

Handle whitespace in query parameters and forms better (Closes: #704026)

--- End Message ---
Reply to: