Hi, On 20.05.2013 20:38, Joachim Breitner wrote: > Also, there are quite a few package where there is one arch always in a > bad state (such as BD-Uninstallable); just exposing one bit of > information is not a lot, when we can expose much more. please don't suggest that a buildd failure is an "error" which needs to be fixed by showing an icon with such a connotation in DDPO. BD-Uninstallable is a good example you mentioned. That could be misleading in such that developers might blacklist these architectures explicitly just to have a "clean" view in DDPO, contrary to best practices. -- with kind regards, Arno Töll IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature