[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#706567: marked as done (PTS: shows problem box for iceowl not part of unstable/experimental)



Your message dated Thu, 02 May 2013 03:45:36 +0000
with message-id <E1UXkSe-0006vB-Po@vasks.debian.org>
and subject line qa.debian.org bug fixed in revision 2981
has caused the Debian Bug report #706567,
regarding PTS: shows problem box for iceowl not part of unstable/experimental
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
706567: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=706567
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hello,

I'm looking at http://packages.qa.debian.org/i/iceowl.html and it shows a
section under problems saying that iceowl is not part of unstable nor
experimental.  Yet 1.9-2 was uploaded to experimental on 2013-04-21 -- it is
even listed in the news section and in the versions section on the side of the
same page.

Did some automated process break down?

--Joe


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (990, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: i386 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Version: 2981

This bug was closed by Paul Wise (pabs) in SVN revision 2981.
Note that it might take some time until the qa.debian.org code has
been updated and cronjobs have picked up changed data.

Commit message:

Use info from experimental in preference to info from stable (Closes: #706567)

--- End Message ---

Reply to: