[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Bug#692492: ITO: Orphaning audit package



(Dropping the bug)

On Tue, 06 Nov 2012, Steve Langasek wrote:
> Private mails should not be a justification for expedited orphaning of
> packages.  With this bug report you have *now* used a proper channel for
> notifying the maintainer that you want to salvage the package; so the clock
> starts now, not whenever your private mail was sent.

I disagree. Private mails (barring mistakes) are more likely to be
effective ways to reach a maintainer that looks busy. My BTS mails
is stored in folders that I will not open when I'm really swamped but
I do always read my private mails.

We can institude to CC debian-email@lists.debian.org on similar private
mails so that they are archived (non-publicly) for other DD to investigate
in case it's needed (see master:/srv/mail-archives/archive/debian-email).

But private mails should count in the ITO evaluation.

Cheers,
-- 
Raphaël Hertzog ◈ Debian Developer

Get the Debian Administrator's Handbook:
→ http://debian-handbook.info/get/


Reply to: