[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#633785: Remaining wnpp-* scripts won't work anymore (dak and bts2ldap is missing)



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal


Similar to the problem reported in #632092, the remaining wnpp scripts
won't work anymore because of the dead bts2ldap interface.

Affected scripts are:

* maintainers-needed.pl [1] (indirect)
* wnpp-disposable [2]
* wnpp-lint [3]
* wnpp-publicize [4]

gen-orphaned was fixed by me in #632092. What to do with the remaining
wnpp scripts? The scripts itself are perhaps still useful (although
apparently nobody noticed they're dead since a while), but even if they
were ported to the SOAP interface, some still require access to dak,
which is not accessible from the QA host.

So basically, one would have to get rid of dak and bts2ldap dependencies
(perhaps using UDD instead), but I'm not able to fix those scripts, as I
(afaict) can't access the input files, and purpose of some of those
scripts is not exactly obvious to me (as I'm not able to run it).

Alternatives include, but are not limited to archive the scripts and get
rid of them.

[1]
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/data/wnpp/maintainers-needed.pl?view=markup

[2]
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/data/wnpp/wnpp-disposable?view=markup
[3]
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/data/wnpp/wnpp-lint?view=markup
[4]
http://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/qa/trunk/data/wnpp/wnpp-publicize?view=markup

- -- 
with kind regards,
Arno Töll
IRC: daemonkeeper on Freenode/OFTC
GnuPG Key-ID: 0x9D80F36D
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
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=vwDA
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: