Context: linking the wnpp page [1] the bugs [2] page. [1] http://www.debian.org/devel/wnpp/ [2] http://www.debian.org/Bugs/ Hi, On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 15:59:33 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote: > On Mon, 2004-12-20 at 12:33 -0600, David Moreno Garza wrote: >> Well, I'm just thinking the link could be added to the Supplementary >> Information section with a text like 'The current list of the >> Work-Needing and Prospective Packages'. Nothin else. >> >> I'm just saying since wnpp is a pseudo-package in BTS, it could be >> exactly a _supplementary information_ to be added on the BTS page. Of >> course it is not a main information, it could be even added on a >> probably new heading like 'Related BTS information'. >> >> wnpp is related to BTS and it is not referred from the BTS page section. > > Hello, owner@bugs.debian.org, > > I would like to see if there is not objection in your part by adding a > wnpp link to the Supplementary Information on the main Bugs page. tbm > suggested to ask you too. > > There is no objection from Frank (adding it to the Supplementary > Information). > > I know this may not be a big deal, but I'm trying to solve or push bugs > against www.debian.org. Same here: since there was no answer (nor action) for almost seven years, and since the wnpp purpose is a bit different IMHO, I'm closing this bug. I'm anyway CCing debian-qa also in charge of www.d.o/wnpp in case someone may have another opinion (in such case, please reopen the bug and eventually propose a patch so we can fix it the other way around). Regards David
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature