[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#551521: marked as done ([UDD] please expose a list of RC-buggy and/or ANY-buggy packages)



Your message dated Wed, 27 Jul 2011 23:58:54 +0200
with message-id <20110727215854.GA5896@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#551521: [UDD] please expose a list of RC-buggy and/or ANY-buggy packages
has caused the Debian Bug report #551521,
regarding [UDD] please expose a list of RC-buggy and/or ANY-buggy packages
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
551521: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=551521
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org

Hi,

It would be nice to get impression of the current (topmost) bug numbers, for 
instance:

packages with more than 1 open RC-bug
packages with more than 10/100 open bugs (any kind of)

and eventually reports about packages with bugs tagged as 'request for help', 
'more info' and 'wontfix'.

thanks
-- 
pub 4096R/0E4BD0AB <people.fccf.net/danchev/key pgp.mit.edu>



--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 18/10/09 at 22:57 +0200, George Danchev wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It would be nice to get impression of the current (topmost) bug numbers, for 
> instance:
> 
> packages with more than 1 open RC-bug
> packages with more than 10/100 open bugs (any kind of)
> 
> and eventually reports about packages with bugs tagged as 'request for help', 
> 'more info' and 'wontfix'.

Closing. There are several use cases described in this bug. Some are
addressed by http://udd.debian.org/bugs.cgi.  Others would be better
addressed by one-shot queries run from alioth.

Lucas


--- End Message ---

Reply to: