Bug#612397: marked as done (UDD: bugs.cgi should still also show lenny RCs)
Your message dated Wed, 9 Feb 2011 21:48:26 +0100
with message-id <20110209204826.GA26459@xanadu.blop.info>
and subject line Re: Bug#612397: UDD: bugs.cgi should still also show lenny RCs
has caused the Debian Bug report #612397,
regarding UDD: bugs.cgi should still also show lenny RCs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
612397: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=612397
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: qa.debian.org
Severity: normal
Hi!
lenny is supposed to be still supported for a year so it would be cool
to have the bugs.cgi script be able to show bugs_rt_affects_oldstable.
Strangely "\d bugs_rt_affects_stable" gives me an error message so I
can't provide a patch here (it could easily be that I'm doing something
wrong), but adjusting that view should hopefully be straight forward
enough to do it.
Thanks in advance,
Rhonda
--
"What are the differences between Mark Zuckerberg and me? I give private
information on corporations to you for free, and I'm a villain.
Zuckerberg gives your private information to corporations for money and
he's Man of the Year." -- Julian Assange
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 08/02/11 at 10:54 +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote:
> Package: qa.debian.org
> Severity: normal
>
>
> Hi!
>
> lenny is supposed to be still supported for a year so it would be cool
> to have the bugs.cgi script be able to show bugs_rt_affects_oldstable.
> Strangely "\d bugs_rt_affects_stable" gives me an error message so I
> can't provide a patch here (it could easily be that I'm doing something
> wrong), but adjusting that view should hopefully be straight forward
> enough to do it.
Done.
- Lucas
--- End Message ---
Reply to: